Sunday, 6 April 2025

Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Protective Underwear Review

 *For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology


 

Summary

For this review I’ll be revisiting the category of youth-focused products as a followup to my review of the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T. In this review I’ll be covering the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T to provide a more complete assessment of the Pull-Ups lineup. Although on the surface the two gendered products appear to mostly vary by backsheet design, the padding design differs in each with gender-targeted protection similar to the differences between the Goodnites Boys and Girls. When reviewing the Goodnites product I did find a small but notable difference in performance between the two so these two reviews may also add some credibility to those findings. There’s been a lot of attention toward larger youth products since my first review of this category and I understand they have benefits in terms of cost savings and filling a sizing gap between baby and adult products with limited market selection. Once again, my focus on these reviews will be assessing the largest of youth products on the market and determining whether any of these will work for larger youth/small adults. Obviously my review will have some flaws as I typically fit small/medium adult products so I do my best to extrapolate to performance for scaled down sizing.

I refer to Pull-Ups as protective underwear, but in reality they don’t quite fit the category of being protective underwear or a diaper. Rather they are a hybrid product that can be used as protective underwear by pulling them up or down, or you can use the hook & loop fasteners on the sides to change them like a diaper without removing clothing. This is a unique feature that I haven’t really come across in my reviews of primarily adult focused products. It may reflect Pull-Ups marketed purpose for toilet training as a product for transitioning out of diapers. Like the boys version there is a day and night version of the girls, this review covers the day version where the night version should be more absorbent. In terms of fit, these are again surprising and should fit significantly above the suggested weight range. I found the stretchy sides on the girls to be maybe a hint tighter than the boys version but I was still able to “wear” them for an extended time without fail, which is quite amazing given my relative size. It was far from a good fit for me and the low rise up the waist would be the biggest issue above a certain height. However, I did get a good idea of the limits of this product and, like the boys' version, feel it could reasonably work for someone up to 110 lbs (50 kg) with a waist of 24~26” (61-66 cm). Absorbency could be the biggest issue as they’re prone to leaking above a 300 ml (10 oz) wetting and these came out slightly less absorbent than the boys version, but if they fit and that absorbency is sufficient they can be purchased at a rather affordable unit price. I’d like to give a special thanks for the suggestion and donation that supported this review! Once again, all donations and suggestions are greatly appreciated!


Key Features:

  • Cloth-like backsheet
  • Dual waistbands
  • Colorful Disney character prints
  • Standing inner leak guards
  • Wetness indicator
  • Refastenable sides

Pros:

  • Comfortable and breathable
  • Easy to change
  • Highly flexible/durable

Cons:

  • Low absorbency
  • Thin mid/rear padding, susceptible to pressout leaks
  • Very small sizing (this product is designed for youths)

 

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the medium-sized 5T-6T sized Pull-Ups Girls Protective Underwear. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Huggies Pull-Ups
Manufacturer: Kimberly-Clark Corp
Origin: USA
Units Per Bag: 14
Cost Per Unit: $
Dimensions (L x W x H): 15 cm (5.9") x 11 cm (4.3") x 23 cm (9.1")
Weight: 0.5 kg (1.1 lbs)
Available Sizes: 2T-3T,3T-4T,4T-5T,5T-6T
Advertised Absorbency: Day-Time

1.1 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Packaging

Diaper

Backsheet: Cloth-like (non-woven)
Wetness Indicator: Yes (blue instrument outline at crotch, fades when wet)
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Hybrid Protective Underwear
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 1
Repositionable Tabs: Yes
Outer Color: Purple (Disney Minnie Mouse patterns)
Inner Color: White (purple sides)
Front Waistband: Yes
Rear Waistband: Yes
Folded Thickness: 1.2 cm (0.47")
Folded Length: 23 cm (9.1")
Dry Weight: 40 g (1.4 oz)
Fragrance: No
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 53 cm (20.9") x 28 cm (11") x 16.5 cm (6.5") x 27 cm (10.6")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 42 cm (16.5") x 10.5 cm (4.1") x 8 cm (3.2") x 9 cm (3.5")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 1.3 cm (0.5") x 8 cm (3.2") x 0.5 cm (0.2") x 8 cm (3.2")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Semicircle, Semicircle
Total Padding Area: 364 cm2 (56 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1): 1 cm (0.4")
Tape (W x L): 11.5 cm (4.5") x 1.5 cm (0.6")

1.2 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Protective Underwear


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 435 ml (15.3 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 510 ml (18 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (47 s, 44 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 3 cm (1.2")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 100%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 1.2 ml / cm2 (0.27 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 75 ml (2.7 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 5

The padding in the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T appeared to be slightly less resistant to surface dampness than the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T. In the lab test, a bit of moisture appeared on the paper towel test in the girls version whereas the boys version showed nothing at the same point. I did find overall absorbency to be less in this protective underwear compared with the boys version so I suspect those minor differences caused this result. In real world testing, it wasn’t too different from the Goodnites XL in terms of performance.



2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test


"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 370 ml (13.1 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing)
Leaked After Sitting: Yes
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 100%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 1.02 ml / cm2 (0.23 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 2
The Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T matched the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T when standing and sitting, though I felt it experienced a little more pooling. The first wetting while standing really should have leaked, there was quickly substantial pooling that failed to subside. However, the leak guards kept it completely locked away. This may be a side-effect of being far too large for this product because the barriers created an ultra snug fit. Ironically, for those more appropriately sized leaks may have occurred at the same capacity due to a looser fit. In any case, there weren’t any leaks but pooling was obvious even when walking several minutes after. It was clear that it would leak upon sitting and, indeed, there was a significant leak almost immediately upon sitting. It was again less absorbent than the Goodnites, as you might expect but overall absorbency wasn’t too different from the Pull-Ups Boys version. For youth daily needs this is likely sufficient and total absorbency would be the best indicator on what to expect here. Once again, for consistency I’m rating this relative to the absorbency metrics I’ve established in this blog. Adjusted for youth needs I’d score this better, perhaps in the range of 6 or 7 with half of an adult bladder capacity to provide a reference.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 365 ml (12.9 oz)
Total Wettings: 1
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 99%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 1.0 ml / cm2 (0.23 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 1

The Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T performed similar to the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T when lying down. Again this protective underwear isn’t designed for bedwetting and there’s a night version or Goodnites product lines that fulfill that role. During the first wetting there was quick pooling and leakage out through the front leak guards into the wings. By the end of the wetting the padding was nearly completely saturated. Again, absorbency wasn’t considerably different from Goodnites L/XL Boys or Goodnites L/XL girls, even though both didn’t approach that level of saturation. However, this underwear ended up absorbing less than either of those two night products or the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T, suggesting slightly more absorbency in the boys version. Once again, I’m rating the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T according to the general standard in this blog, which matches it to adult diapers. When adjusted for youth needs, performance would be considered significantly better and it would be better to look at overall absorbency to assess the performance relative to other products in this category.

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

Having previously reviewed the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T, I had a pretty good idea for what to expect from the girls version. The challenge I had with these reviews is that I’m a lot larger than the intended weight range. Nevertheless, the ultra stretchy sides used on these meant I was actually able to pull these up and functionally try them for testing. The feel was what I would expect from a smaller version of the Goodnites XL. Surprisingly, absorbency wasn’t considerably different from the Goodnites Girls XL even though the target weight range and use for the two products is quite different. It would seem many of the youth-focused products produced by Kimberly-Clark have the same core padding structure with only a modest increase in length at about 5 cm (2”) but very similar thicknesses between the Goodnites XL and Pull-Ups 5T-6T. I’ll again note that the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T has dimensions at about 80% of the Goodnites XL, so extrapolating downward based on the more generous Goodnites sizing, these could probably fit someone up to 110 lbs (50 kg) with a waist of 24~26” (61~66 cm) and still feel reasonably comfortable and manage moderate incontinence. This could make it a good choice for larger youths with special needs or very small adults, though in either case I’d recommend using it with a booster pad. Neither product is exceptionally absorbent and both are susceptible to pressout moisture when sitting after a wetting. In this case, with the core focus being on toilet training that’s probably fine as you’d expect it to be wet less frequently and changed more frequently when accidents do occur. Compared with the boys version the ultra absorbent core on the girls Pull-Ups 5T-6T is about 3 cm (1.2”) shorter at 17 cm (6.7”) vs 20 cm (7.9”) for the boys. The core padding on the girls version is also located 5 cm (2”) below the front edge of the padding vs 1 cm (0.4”) down on the boys version. This matches up with the gender differences observed between the Girls and Boys Goodnites XL and also explains why this one appeared a little more susceptible to surface dampness and slightly less absorbent in spite of the other measurements being nearly identical. When tested during daily wear I found these could manage a wetting while standing, but were far more prone to leaks upon sitting as well as initial pooling that put them at risk of leaks. With a smaller bladder (wettings of 250 m / 8.5 oz or less) or light/moderate leaks this protective underwear should manage just fine in daily wear so long as it can be changed before a second wetting. I wouldn’t recommend it for overnight wear given the rear padding isn’t great at absorption and there’s a Pull-Ups Night version or Goodnites that target bedwetting. From the perspective of someone well above the weight range, it’s nice to know that these can work and would be a feasible, if imperfect option, if I were really stuck for options and couldn’t find a larger product. Yet, I wouldn’t expect them to fit much larger than 38” hips or a 32” waist (though I’ve heard some suggestions to extend the waist fit via cutting/chaining the wings, which I’ll try to cover in a future youth product review). All said, the boys version provides a bit more value in terms of theoretical absorbency, but again these do come out quite a bit cheaper than Goodnites or adult diapers so if you find they actually work for your needs then you could gain considerable savings by using these over the alternatives.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 6

The Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T should perform similar to the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T when it comes to managing bowel leakage. Again, compared with the similar Goodnites product, the easy-change sides will be a plus in this case as the protective underwear can be removed without having to pull it all the way down (which could be messy after a bowel movement). Again, these have key features for bowel management like standing inner leak guards and dual waistbands. Though they also have a breathable design that could make them susceptible to odors. All in all, these are probably better suited for this purpose than regular protective underwear, but not quite as well suited as regular diapers.

 

Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T is designed for a weight range of 46-60 lbs (21-27 kg) and joins the boys version at the largest end of the Pull-Ups lineup. Again, the target range for this product is clearly targeted at youths. With that said, the flexibility of the product means it could actually fit very small adults or teens and there’s a generous amount of give above the 60 lbs (27 kg) limit. These can be thought of as a scaled down version of Goodnites in terms of fit. However, unlike Goodnites, these have refastenable side panels similar to what you’d find on diapers, making it more of a hybrid diaper-protective underwear design. In this way they can be changed like a diaper or pulled on like protective underwear. What’s notable is that the hook & loop fasteners are located on the front wings rather than the rear wings like you’d find in regular diapers. The rise on these is very low, ideally suited for those at or under 4 ft 10” (147 cm) tall. Yet the elastic sides, leg gathers and waistbands will support much larger waists up to 31” (78 cm) or more.

3.1 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Fastener

Ease-of-Use Rating: 9

You won’t find any difference in terms of ease-of-use between the Pull-Ups 5T-6T boys or girls protective underwear. The premise is pretty simple, you can pull them up and down like regular underwear or attach/detach the sides to change into/out of them like you would a diaper. These have a wetness indicator that appears as the blue/green outline of an instrument below the crotch that fades when wet. Again, the biggest challenge to these is in the fastener alignment if you want to put one on like you would a diaper. With the fastener on the front and facing outward you really need to get a perfect alignment of the fastener and the leading edge of the rear wing to get a proper fit. Pulling too much can lead to the rear wing overhanging the front, making it more at risk of being torn off. However, again I don’t weigh this heavily against the Pull-Ups product since this isn’t their core use case and the hybrid design is already a big market differentiator in its own right.

3.2 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Protective Underwear Fit

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 9

There’s no substantial difference between the girls and boys Pull-Ups in terms of comfort when dry, which mirrors the feel of Goodnites. Consequently I rate them the same in this regard. This is accounting for a sizing that fits its target weight range. They were clearly too small for me, but I was able to get a good sense of the feel because I was able to wear them successfully. These are very flexible and highly breathable. They don’t have edges that are likely to cause much irritation. The padding is quite thin, but robust and not likely to clump or tear. Also, the design with the hook & loop fasteners facing outward makes them less likely to come into contact with the wearer’s skin.


Comfort Rating (wet): 6

There was no perceptible difference in wet comfort between the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T and the boys version even though this one did appear a little more prone to surface dampness. The padding structure in these and the Goodnites products is all very similar. The padding is quite thin, but durable, yet quite susceptible to pressout moisture in the mid-section/rear. Surface dampness was the biggest comfort detractor; I didn’t notice any additional clumping or tearing when wet. Otherwise, overstretching in the sides could cause some susceptibility to sagging after extended wear, but I wouldn’t consider that to be too big an issue for this level of absorbency.

3.3 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Topsheet and Backsheet

Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 8% (topsheet), 12% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 3 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 9

I rate the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T highly when it comes to dry durability. The sides on this protective underwear are incredibly durable. I managed to not only wear these, but also exercise in them without any issue with the sides coming apart or significant padding deterioration. That’s saying something, because I was far too large for these and someone of appropriate fit will surely find them even more durable. What I did find was that the sides can overstretch a bit after a period of extended wear, which might result in them coming loose. With the refastenable sides any looseness could be accommodated by making an adjustment on the wing attachment. In fact, I tried refastening these several times and the fasteners will indeed hold together without much impact from multiple fastening.


Durability Rating (wet): 8

There was little difference in durability between the wet and dry state of the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T. I found the padding was virtually identical in both states. Though I would say these are slightly prone to sagging after extended wear because the sides can lose a bit of their flexibility. Then again, it was a pretty minor issue. These don’t have a huge amount of absorbency so the weight of the wet Pull-Up is unlikely to have much impact on its structure and you’re unlikely to notice a breakdown during active wear even when wet.

3.4 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Dry Test Deterioration


Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 0 cm (0"), 0 cm (0")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 0 cm (0"), 0 cm (0")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 0 cm (0"), 0 cm (0")

Profile Discretion Rating: 10

The Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T has the profile of scaled down Goodnites. The Goodnites products are designed for discretion and while these perhaps target a younger market where discretion may be less sensitive they inherently have a very discreet profile. The padding is thin and the waistline raise is relatively low in proportion to its sizing. The obvious caveat here is that they do have colorful Disney Characters on the backsheet, which would stand out if they were seen.

4.1 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 


Noise

Noise Rating: 10

The Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T again matches the boys version for noise discretion. These are made of a very flexible material that doesn’t produce much in terms of the resistance that would typically result in noise. I can’t say I noticed much or any sound when walking or sitting. Though it is possible for the hook & loop fasteners to produce noise if shifted, they’re quite resilient and I didn’t notice any during my testing.

4.3 Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T Noise Profile

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 5

I can’t say the Pull-Ups 5T-6T or Goodnites products are really great with odor discretion. They don’t have any added fragrance but a very breathable design. The padding coverage is also quite thin and of a limited area. The rear padding in particular is quite prone to surface dampness and will give off odors when wet. However, for a product that focuses on toilet training as its primary purpose odor reduction may be less of a concern.


Want to give the Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T a try?

Help us continue to produce quality reviews by making a purchase through our Pull-Ups Girls 5T-6T affiliate link. With every purchase this blog will earn a small amount of commission at no extra cost to the purchaser.


Monday, 31 March 2025

Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Swimwear + My Pool Pal Swim Diaper Review

 *For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology


 

Summary

In this review I’m deviating a little from my regular reviews to cover a category of product generally known as “swim diapers”. These products are primarily designed for containing bowel incontinence when swimming or otherwise in the water. Consequently, they will do little to nothing for containing urinary incontinence. For this review I’ll be covering the Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Swimwear, a protective underwear type product, and the My Pool Pal swim diaper, which is a plastic pant type product. For consistency I’ve kept this review to fit within the criteria I’ve established for other reusable and disposable products. Still, I’ll try to take care to point out where an attribute may be more-or-less irrelevant to this completely different category of product.

The Tranquility Swimmates protective underwear are unique in that they’re virtually the only non-reusable style product of this type on the market that targets adult wear (and larger youth wear). There are a few companies like Huggies or Pampers that produce a similar small youth range product. It’s a very niche market and I can’t imagine it has a very high volume of product turnover compared to regular incontinence products, so it’s very fortunate that there are companies that have gone out of their way to produce products specifically for this purpose.This underwear is designed to be submerged so the padding acts more like a sponge with limited capacity that doesn’t clump or fall apart in water. The main focus of this product are the layers of leak guards to prevent fecal matter from escaping. They’re designed to be worn under regular swimwear and will not show a significant profile.

The My Pool Pal definition as a “swim diaper” is a bit of a misnomer because it’s not what you’d think of being a diaper nor does it have any absorbent padding. Instead this is a plastic pant product designed specifically for containing fecal episodes when swimming or in the water. It’s also described as “disposable”, but that’s actually only the case once soiled. In fact, these are marketed as being reusable multiple times if they aren’t soiled. The reason for this is that the inner layer is made of an antimicrobial barrier that neutralizes bacteria from fecal matter. However, this part of the product will only be effective for a single usage. Moreover, this product could alternatively be used like a diaper cover. The company behind this product, Future Products Corporation, has been providing incontinence swimwear since it was approved by public health and swimming facilities in 1992. The plastic-pant type/reusable market for incontinence swimwear appears to be a little more competitive, but as far as I can tell this is the only one with the neutralizing layer and this company has been selling such products for a very long time so they must be doing something right.

This review was one of the most challenging for me as I only suffer irregular bowel incontinence and rarely swim or bathe in a bath in my daily life. Nevertheless, I’ve tried my best to capture the performance of these products and use my past experience combined with testing to give insight into how these products could be expected to perform in the real world. I’d like to give a big shout out for the My Pool Pal donation that introduced me to these product lines and helped make this review possible! As always, suggestions and donations are always welcome!


Key Features:

  • Cloth-like backsheet (My Pool Pal are plastic)
  • Flexible elastic stretch fit
  • Standing Inner Leak Guards (Tranquility Swimmates)
  • Antibacterial layer (My Pool Pal)

Pros:

  • Discreet profile
  • Very comfortable and flexible in water
  • The fact they even exist (it’s quite a niche area of focus)

Cons:

  • Low absorbency out of the water
  • Water discharge when existing water

 

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the medium-sized Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Swimwear and My Pool Pal Swim Diapers. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Swimwear Packaging

Brand: Tranquility
Manufacturer: Principle Business Enterprise
Origin: USA
Units Per Bag: 20
Cost Per Unit: $$
Dimensions (L x W x H): 31 cm (12.2") x 15 cm (5.9") x 24 cm (9.5")
Weight: 0.88 kg (1.93 lbs)
Available Sizes: S,M,L,XL,2XL
Advertised Absorbency: Swimwear

1.1 Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Swimwear Packaging


My Pool Pal Packaging

Brand: My Pool Pal
Manufacturer: Future Products Corporation
Origin: USA
Units Per Bag: 3
Cost Per Unit: $$$$
Dimensions (L x W x H): 13 cm (5.1") x 4 cm (1.6") x 21 cm (8.3")
Weight: 0.1 kg (0.22 lbs)
Available Sizes: XS,S,M,L,Adult XS, Adult S, Adult M, Adult L, Adult XL
Advertised Absorbency: Swimwear


1.2 My Pool Pal Swim Diapers Packaging


Protective Underwear (Tranquility Swimmates)

Backsheet: Cloth-like (non-woven)
Wetness Indicator: No
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Protective Underwear
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: N/A
Repositionable Tabs: No
Outer Color: Light Blue (white connecting sides)
Inner Color: White (light blue down the middle padding)
Front Waistband: Yes
Rear Waistband: Yes
Folded Thickness: 1.66 cm (0.65")
Folded Length: 25 cm (9.8")
Dry Weight: 50 g (1.8 oz)
Fragrance: No
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 72 cm (28.4") x 31 cm (12.2") x 19 cm (7.5") x 30 cm (11.8")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Connected, Connected
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 33 cm (13") x 11 cm (4.3") x 10 cm (3.9") x 15 cm (5.9")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 0.5 cm (0.2") x 6 cm (2.4") x 2.5 cm (1") x 10 cm (3.9")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Semicircle, Semicircle
Total Padding Area: 386 cm2 (60 in2)

1.3 Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Swimwear

Protective Underwear (My Pool Pal)

Backsheet: Plastic (poly)
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Plastic pants
Outer Color: White
Inner Color: White
Folded Length: 38 cm (15")
Dry Weight: 33 g (1.2 oz)
Pants Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 76 cm (29.9") x 43 cm (16.9") x 12 cm (4.7") x 43 cm (16.9")
Pants Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 31 cm (12.2") x 18.5 cm (7.3") x 31 cm (12.2") x 12.2 cm (18.5")
Total Pant Area: 3206 cm2 (497 in2)

1.4 My Pool Pal Swim Diaper


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 150 ml (5.3 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 250 ml (8.8 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (107 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 2 cm (0.8")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 100%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 0.39 ml / cm2 (0.09 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 100 ml (3.5 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 1

As a product designed for water wear, Tranquility Swimmates have almost no absorbency by design. They’re designed to contain bowel movements without swelling up too much in water. As such they’re highly susceptible to pressout and don’t do anything to contain moisture. In this case having no resistance to surface dampness is actually a positive attribute for performance.



2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test


"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 245 ml (8.6 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing)
Leaked After Sitting: Yes
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 100%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.63 ml / cm2 (0.14 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 1
The Tranquility Swimmates underwear is designed for bowel containment in water so absorbency tests are a bit redundant. Nevertheless, this underwear may be worn in situations before entering the water and it's good to get an idea of how it might perform in such circumstances. As expected, the Swimmates underwear leaked on the very first wetting. Initially there was major pooling as moisture was contained within the leak barriers. Interestingly, the backsheet is moisture impermeable so all the moisture was contained until it reached the leg gathers. Needless to say this isn’t a product you’d use for daily bladder wear or even bowel containment out of the water, though it may contain light leaks.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 175 ml (6.2 oz)
Total Wettings: 1
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 76%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.45 ml / cm2 (0.10 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 1

The Tranquility Swimmates under isn’t well equipped for bedwetting as you might expect based on the results in the standing-sitting test. Even so, I decided to put it to the test for the purpose of review completeness with the understanding that it goes against the purpose of this protective underwear. As expected, it leaked very soon into the first wetting. Moisture rapidly accumulated at the back of the underwear. It didn’t immediately escape due to the leak guards and impermeable section of backsheet above the padding. Instead, there were modest leaks through the rear leg gathers but as soon as I got up there was a rush of moisture out of the structure since very little had been absorbed. I must reiterate that this inability to retain significant amounts of moisture is actually a plus when it comes to providing bowel protection while swimming so take this scoring with a grain of salt.

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


My Pool Pal Swim Diaper Additional Protection Score: 6

I’ve followed the same relative rating system to assess additional protection value of the My Pool Pal as I did for the Carer reusable products. These plastic pants by their nature have no built in absorbency so the best they can do is prevent leaks that have escaped from an underlying product. This product is primarily designed for swimming so I wasn’t expecting much. I used the same lab test I used for the Carer W66 adding increments of 15 ml to assess maximum absorbency and it maxed out at about 45 ml when sitting before any leakage occurred. I also tried my standard test for these reusable products where I combined it with a wet Goodnites XL, a product that will often leak when seated if not worn with a booster. Unfortunately, even this combination usage resulted in a substantial leak, more so than I experienced with the W66. The crotch of these plastic pants is relatively narrow, which may be beneficial for swimming and movement but it makes it more susceptible to gaps between the thighs and, consequently, leakage when seated. I’d recommend these plastic pants for use in water overuse as additional protection, but if worn strictly when lying down and not seated you may find they perform a little better.

2.4 My Pool Pal as Additional Protection for Tranquility Swimmates


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

In typical reviews I will try building a product into my daily routine to assess performance outside of a fixed set of tests where variable circumstances might expose issues I wouldn’t otherwise notice. This meant wearing overnight for bedwetting as well as daily wear and assessment for active wear. Doing such testing was pretty pointless for the Tranquility Swimmates and My Pool Pal Swim Diapers because these are primarily designed for water wear. In previous testing I found that neither of these products provided adequate protection against a full or even half a wetting, so if you were in a situation where you’d need to be in swimwear for an extended time before actually swimming then you’d probably want to use these in combination with a high absorbency incontinence pad, which you’d remove before entering the water. This would be easier to do with the Tranquility Swimmates than the My Pool Pals because the Tranquility Swimmates have leak barriers and a snugger fit to hold a pad. To do the same with My Pool Pals you’d probably want to combine them with a meshpant layer underneath to use with the pad, or combine them with the Tranquility Swimmates.
 
In my case, it was a challenge to review these products for a couple reasons. First, I almost never swim outside of a few months in the summer and second, I only suffer from infrequent episodes of bowel incontinence so the chances of being swimming and dealing with an episode are very low for me. Nevertheless, I’ve tried my best to do an accurate assessment of how this product will perform based on my previous experience and facilities I had available (a large bathtub). To put these to the test, I filled the bathtub and tried to bathe as I typically would do in such circumstances. I tried a diverse set of movements, including getting in and out of the tub while wearing these products.

For my first test I went with a stand-alone Tranquility Swimmates. Entering the water was easy with these and they quickly saturated but continued to feel light and flexible. I didn’t find any significant resistance upon moving around in the tub. In fact I barely noticed this underwear when it was wet, even less so than in its dry state. Getting out of the water was interesting and an area I’d say you’d need to manage with some care if you’d had a bowel episode. What I noticed was that water that had accumulated under the moisture impermeable backsheet can rush outside through the leg gathers as you get up. I imagine the inner barriers would still have enough flexibility to hold back fecal matter, but anything that had got around them may be at risk of escaping. Otherwise, the rear leak barriers are quite well designed in this underwear and I didn’t feel any other situations would put it at high risk of leakage.

I found a similar issue when testing the My Pool Pals as a second test. In that case there was an even larger discharge of water after exiting since the backsheet is looser and able to pick up more water. The My Pool Pals had another challenge in that they could also retain air and form air pockets when entering the water; an issue I didn’t notice in the Tranquility Swimmates. Once the air escaped, the My Pool Pals did a better job at conforming to my body and felt even more comfortable when wet than in their dry state. The backsheet of these is completely moisture impermeable, so they can be used for non-swimming cases, but I felt the crotch was a bit too narrow to provide strong additional protection for another absorbent product when worn outside the water (indeed when I tested them as additional protection with a Goodnites XL they were unable to hold back a leak while seated). The My Pool Pals do have one big advantage over the Tranquility Swimmates in that they’re treated with an antibacterial formulation that can help neutralize bacteria before it can enter the water. Perhaps the best way to avoid contamination when swimming would be to double up the Tranquility Swimmates and My Pool Pals so if anything escapes the Swimmates it will at least have a chance to be caught/neutralized by the Pool Pals. I did a quick test wearing both as combined protection and it does indeed seem like a feasible option given the differences in coverage. In terms of best use case for each, I feel the My Pool Pals could be a better choice if you suffer infrequent episodes but want that extra protection since they can be reused multiple times until soiled. Every time you’re able to reuse it you’d lower the initial unit cost vs the Tranquility Swimmates, which can only be used a single time regardless of if they’re soiled. I’m not sure if this has an impact on the effectiveness of the antibacterial layer. The Tranquility Swimmates would provide more protection and probably better value if you had a higher chance of soiling. The Tranquility Swimmates also have a snugger fit and could be a bit more discreet so they may be the better choice where discretion matters more. Ultimately, it may also come down to if you prefer the feel of plastic-pants or underwear when in the water.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 5* (10 for swim usage)

I’ve ranked the Tranquility Swimmates relatively low for bowel containment outside of the water to be consistent with other ratings on this site. This isn’t a product you’d want for managing bowel incontinence for daily wear, but I doubt you could find a better product for wear when in the water. I don’t expect it to do well for odor containment. However, the rear leg gathers are strong and it has a snug fit. There’s a bit more padding toward the rear and it features inner leak guards for an additional layer of protection. The downside is that the breathability could also easily lead to odor escape, but that may be less of an issue in its limited use-case.

 

Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Tranquility Swimmates have a high rise underwear-like fit with a thin, flexible and airy cloth-like backsheet. It doesn’t have well defined waistbands. Instead the stretchy wings continue around the entire waist of the underwear. This means they have a pretty consistent fit, without obvious gaps, though this is pretty typical for protective underwear. I would say the fit is slightly on the larger size compared to typical sizing. The suggested fit for this underwear is interesting because there is both a suggested weight and waist range. I went with the suggested weight range, but since it ended up feeling larger I suspect it might be better to go with the suggested waist as a first measure of fit.

3.1 My Pool Pal Fastener

Ease-of-Use Rating: 8

The Tranquility Swimmates are quite easy to use as you might expect for a protective underwear product. You simply pull them up before going to the water and down when you’re done. Alternatively, you could tear the sides to pull them off. They don’t swell up or break apart in the water so they’re quite resistant and perfect for fecal containment. Of course, being a water-focused product they won’t be as good at containment as a typical diaper; the trade-off being that they will be much better than a regular diaper when used in water. One downside to this trade-off is that they won’t provide adequate protection for urinary incontinence on the way to the water if they need to be worn dry for any extended period of time. For those cases it might make more sense to use it with an absorbent pad insert until you get to the water and pull the pad out before entering the water. Aside from that, I found it was difficult to tell the front of the underwear from the back of it. I found the easiest way to tell the difference was to look at where the padding wings were the widest as that would be the back of the underwear.

3.2 Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Dry Fit

 
3.3 Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Wet Fit



My Pool Pal Fitting

The My Pool Pal has a brief-style underwear fit. It has a lot of interior space and relatively high rise. The elastic at the waist and leg gathers is quite narrow but makes for a snug fit at all the edges. You could easily fit a large diaper under here and will have no trouble doubling it over the Tranquility Swimmates. The sizing seems about average to slightly above. The adult medium size felt a little on the large side for me but I still didn’t have any trouble getting a snug fit. It can also easily be bunched inward for discretion.

3.4 My Pool Pal Fit

 

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 10

The Tranquility Swimmates protective underwear is about as comfortable as you could ask for in its dry state. It has a fairly thin and breathable backsheet. The topsheet is also very soft but there is a relatively limited padding area. The design is quite flexible so if you get an appropriate fit then it won’t sag at all and the padding is quite resilient to clumping or tearing. I wouldn’t expect anyone to wear this underwear in its dry state for long, but for the time you do wear it I expect it will be about as comfortable as it gets.


Comfort Rating (wet): 10

The Tranquility Swimmates protective underwear are designed to be worn in water and I factored that into scoring these when wet. In a non-swim diaper sense you might find these to be uncomfortable due to the high amount of surface dampness and pressout. But in the water these factors result in the underwear being quite comfortable. It doesn’t swell up or put up any resistance to movement in the water. The cloth-like backsheet doesn’t take on any weight with the water and may even feel a bit more comfortable when wet. Moreover, the padding held up remarkably well without any obvious clumping.

3.5 Tranquility Swimmates Topsheet and Backsheet


My Pool Pal Swim Diaper Comfort Score: 9

The My Pool Pal swim diaper provides a strong degree of comfort for a plastic-pant style protection. I found the material to be great for breathability and heat dissipation. It has quite a roomy design so when you’re not seated you’ll find little of the backsheet comes into contact with your skin. The elastic leak guards create snug fit but I didn’t have issues with chafing. If worn as a diaper cover rather than directly then you’d find it even less noticeable. The plastic in this product is quite flexible and doesn’t interfere with movement. I actually found these plastic pants to be more comfortable when worn in the water than when worn dry. The topsheet took on an extra degree of softness when submerged.

3.6 My Pool Pal Topsheet and Backsheet

Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 1.8% (topsheet), 1.7% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 100 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 9
The Tranquility Swimmate underwear isn’t designed for extended dry-wear so this test kind of goes against the purpose. However, I found it to be highly effective after a long duration of dry wear. The padding isn’t susceptible to clumping or tearing but I did notice some minor tears developed over time. The elastic waistband held up well during testing and I didn’t find it came loose or lost flexibility with wear. There was some minor deterioration during testing so I can’t say it was perfect, but this was after a much longer period of dry wear than you might expect to wear it.


Durability Rating (wet): 10

Wet durability was a strong point for the Tranquility Swimmate underwear. Most diapers would quickly clump and tear with significant quantities of water being pushed in and out. The padding in this diaper is unique in that it acts a bit like a sponge. It will take on moisture but won’t swell significantly and will quickly lose moisture when pressed. When I tested shaking it after wet I wasn’t able to dislodge any of the padding after significant shakes. I didn’t notice any difference in terms of clumping or tearing when compared to the dry state. This underwear will be perfect for active wear in the water including swimming.

3.7 Tranquility Swimmates Dry Test Deterioration




My Pool Pal Swim Durability Score: 10

You’re much more likely to replace the My Pool Pal swim diaper because it’s soiled than you’d be to ever encounter any durability issues with it. It’s marketed as reusable until soiled because it has a formulation in the material that neutralizes bacteria when in contact with fecal matter; this loses effectiveness after the first contact. So it’s considered disposable when used for managing fecal episodes, but is otherwise reusable and can be used like regular plastic pants. I tried hand washing it and hanging it to dry and had no issue, though I wouldn’t suggest putting it through a wash cycle. That said, I can’t vouch for what impact this has on the bacteria neutralizing layer.


Discretion Tests


Profile (Tranquility Swimmates)

Front Rise Above Waistline* (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 6 cm (2.4")
Back Rise Above Waistline* (Jeans, Sweatpants): 4.5 cm (1.8"), 3 cm (1.2")
Side Rise Above Waistline* (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 4 cm (1.6") 

 

Profile Discretion Rating: 9

The Tranquility Swimmates underwear has thin padding and a very thin profile, even when wet. You’re unlikely to notice this underwear if worn under a swimsuit. The caveat being that it rises fairly high on the waist and it might peak out from there. If you want to wear this underwear discreetly when swimming then you will also need swimwear that covers it above the waist. 


4.1 Tranquility Swimmates Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Tranquility Swimmates Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 



4.3 Tranquility Swimmates Swim Shorts Profile Dry (top) Wet (bottom)

Noise

Noise Rating: 10

Tranquility Swimmates protective underwear is nearly as quiet as regular underwear. I can’t say that I noticed much noise when wearing this underwear in various circumstances (sitting/standing/walking). You certainly won’t notice it in its primary purpose of being worn in water. Nor did I notice when getting out of the water. Though some may notice more water dripping from your shorts than typical because the moisture impermeable section of backsheet over the padding can hold back a bit of water initially.

 

4.3 Tranquility Swimmates Disposable Swimwear Noise Profile

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 5

It was a bit hard to know what to do with odor scoring for the Tranquility Swimmates. This underwear is designed for wear in water where odor may be less of a concern to matter containment. However, when you exit the water the features that make it resilient for swimming like porous cloth-like material and pressout sensitive padding could make it more susceptible to odors. That said, if it’s soiled you’re likely to change soon after and there may not be much time for the odors to be noticed. All things considered I felt this product fit in about the middle of the scoring in this regard.


My Pool Pal Swim Diaper Discretion Score: 8

I was quite surprised by how discreet the My Pool Pal swim diaper was in spite of what initially looked like a high rise profile. I found that in reality it was easy enough to tuck under the waist. So the rise comparison pictures make it appear less discreet than it could be with clothing adjustments. Moreover, I expected such plastic pants to be very noisy but these were relatively quiet. I did notice noise from these more than in the Carer W66 plastic pants, but it wasn’t particularly loud. Most of the noise appeared to come from “whooshes” of air against the backsheet with certain movements. I can’t speak to odor protection with the same degree of confidence but for the limited time these would need to contain odors I can’t imagine odors being a big concern as the barriers are quite resilient.

4.1 My Pool Pal Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 My Pool Pal Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 



4.3 My Pool Pal Swim Shorts Profile Dry (top) Wet (bottom)

Want to give the Tranquility Swimmates or My Pool Pal Swim Diaper a try?

Help us continue to produce quality reviews by making a purchase through our Tranquility Swimmates or My Pool Pal affiliate link. With every purchase this blog will earn a small amount of commission at no extra cost to the purchaser.