Sunday, 25 October 2020

Lille SupremFit Maxi Adult Diaper Review

 *For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology

Summary

The Lille SupremFit Maxi is a highly absorbent cloth-backed European diaper. Where available it can be found at a surprisingly reasonable price point for the level of absorbency it provides, but has one major downside. This diaper achieves remarkably consistent absorbency performance and is highly resistant to leaking whether worn standing, sitting or laying down. However, the tapes are quite weak and will tend to slide around, this results in the diaper easily coming loose on the wearer. It would be particularly problematic for an active wearer, but even low levels of active will cause the tapes to slide.

This Lille diaper has a front waistband and comfortable topsheet and backsheet. It is relatively compact and consequently quite discreet when it’s not sagging. In practice I found the waistband doesn’t serve much of a purpose as it is challenging to get a good fit. I feel this diaper is well suited to bedwetters or overnight wear in general as it will take up to 2~3 wettings without leakage and the sliding tapes are less of an issue. If this brand put some work into improving the fit it would make for a great all-round adult diaper, but I can’t recommend it for even low activity day wear in its current state.

Key Features:

  • Cloth-like (non-woven backsheet)
  • Repositionable tapes
  • Moisture resistant side panels

Pros:

  • Breathable design
  • Comfortable padding/backsheet
  • Highly/consistently absorbent

Cons:

  • High tendency to become loose
  • Small amount of moisture may escape backsheet
  • Tapes can tear backsheet when re-applied


Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the medium-sized Lille SupremFit Maxi diaper. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Lille
Manufacturer: ONTEX BVBA
Origin: EU
Units Per Bag: 20
Cost Per Unit: $$
Dimensions (L x W x H): 36 cm (14.2") x 16.5 cm (6.5") x 24 cm (9.5")
Weight: 2.7 kg (5.8 lbs)
Available Sizes: S,M,L,XL
Advertised Absorbency: Maxi


1.1 Lille SupremFit Maxi Packaging


Diaper

Backsheet: Cloth-like (non-woven)
Wetness Indicator: Yes (double yellow lines down middle, blue disappears)
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Tab-Style Brief
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 2
Repositionable Tabs: Yes
Outer Color: White (stars + grey boxes down the middle)
Inner Color: White
Front Waistband: Yes
Rear Waistband: No
Folded Thickness: 1.9 cm (0.75")
Folded Length: 24 cm (9.5")
Dry Weight: 127 g (3.8 oz)
Fragrance: None
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 78 cm (30.7") x 62 cm (24.4") x 31 cm (12.2") x 64 (25.2")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 64 cm (25.2") x 22 cm (8.7") x 15 cm (5.9") x 24 cm (9.5")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 3.5 cm (1.4") x 12 cm (4.7") x 4.5 cm (1.8") x 14 cm (5.5")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Semicircle, Semicircle
Total Padding Area: 1170 cm2 (181 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1 x t2): 4 cm (1.6") x 12 cm (4.7")
Tape (W x L): 3 cm (1.2") x 4.5 cm (1.8")


1.2 Lille SupremFit Maxi Diaper


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 1173 ml (41.4 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 1198 ml (42.3 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (40 s, 60 s, 55 s, 55 s, 59 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 5 cm (2")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 85%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 1.0 ml / cm2 (0.23 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 25 ml (0.88 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 8
During the capacity test the Lille SupremFit Maxi didn’t show any signs of dampness after the first wetting and very little on the second wetting. It wasn’t until the 3rd wetting that it became noticeably damp. This resilience against surface dampness was also confirmed in “real world” testing.



2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test


"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 1073 ml (37.9 oz)
Total Wettings: 3 (1 standing, 2 sitting)
Leaked After Sitting: No
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 79%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.92 ml / cm2 (0.21 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 8
The Lille SupremFit Maxi had no problems absorbing a wetting while standing and surface dampness disappeared quickly. Upon sitting there was no sign of leakage and the padding continued to feel dry without any pressout. On the second wetting it was noticeably damp for longer with moisture pushing the edges of the front leak guards. The leak guards held and not long after the diaper was able to wick up the excess moisture. By the third wetting moisture crept up from the front leak guards into the diaper’s breathable sides, but for the most part it was contained. I was surprised that the Lille SupremFit’s breathable sides did such a good job at holding back leaks as many cloth-backed diapers do little to prevent moisture from seeping through the sides. I stopped the test at this point as there was minor leakage from under the rear sides, but there was still a fair amount of unused padding and I feel this diaper could potentially contain up to 4 wettings before significant leakage. Overall this diaper performed well in the stand-sit test and I feel you could confidently wear it for daily use knowing it will absorb at least 2 full wettings before you have to worry about leaks.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 1023 ml (36.1 oz)
Total Wettings: 3
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 89%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.87 ml / cm2 (0.20 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 7
The Lille SupremFit Maxi did a great job at containing leaks when lying down. The first wetting was absorbed relatively quickly with brief pooling and once it was fully absorbed it felt dry and comfortable. The dampness was more apparent on the second wetting and some moisture appeared to permeate through the cloth-like backsheet. It was almost as if there were a light sweat coming out of the diaper; this may have been related to tiny pinholes in the backsheet where minor leakage was observed during the capacity pressout test. I’m not sure this affects every diaper or just an issue for a few defective ones, but it only becomes a problem when the diaper is near saturation. By the third wetting the Lille diaper experienced a major leak through the rear leg gathers. Based on this I feel its performance when worn for bedwetting can be expected to be similar to, or perhaps slightly better than, the Tranquility ATN. It has better capacity than the ATN, but the ATN doesn’t have the same sort of diaper “sweating” phenomenon. Overall, I would still recommend this diaper for bed wetting and feel it can comfortably absorb 2 full wettings without any significant leakage.

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)

Daily Wear and Bedwetting

The Lille SupremFit Maxi diaper seems best suited to less active wearers, because it has a strong tendency to come loose. It was one of the most consistent diapers in terms of absorbency across the capacity and real world tests and is very unlikely to leak on the first two wettings. The diaper is also reasonably comfortable and breathable so not prone to causing rashes or skin irritation. When tested for daily use the diaper had no problems with leakage but became uncomfortable because it kept sliding down, this was even more of an issue when the diaper was wet and started to sag. So for daily use I wouldn’t recommend it unless it's worn under a good pair of underwear or mesh pants. When worn for bedwetting the diaper did a bit better, but again by the morning it had somehow come loose. Fortunately when lying down the looseness is less noticeable, but I still feel it detracts from its comfort. Otherwise, this diaper is effective at absorbing moisture but the backsheet appears to allow very small amounts of it to escape, which can result in a sweat-like effect on the backsheet when the diaper is saturated.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Lille SupremFit Maxi features a cloth-like backsheet with hook and loop (Velcro-like) / partial tape fasteners. The tape part of the adhesive is weaker and will pull fabric off the backsheet when pulled. The hook and loop fastener makes up about 1/5th of the surface area of the tapes in strips. The tapes can be removed/reapplied but they have a tendency to come loose.


3.1 Lille SupremFit Maxi Fastener


Ease-of-Use Rating: 5
At first glance the Lille SupremFit diaper is about as easy as you would expect of a cloth-backed diaper with tabs that can be positioned or repositioned anywhere on the backsheet. It also features a front waistband, which typically would assist in getting a good fit. Yet, it is very difficult to get a good fit and even when you do it often becomes loose because the tapes slide around and the sides seem to stretch out over time.



3.2 Lille SupremFit Maxi Fit


Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 6
The Lille SupremFit Maxi has a comfortable construct with soft padding and cloth-like backsheet material. The diaper also does a decent job at dissipating heat from its sides and doesn’t chafe when worn while walking. However, I found it almost impossible to get a snug fit with this diaper as it kept wanting to come loose. If it weren’t for that I would probably rate it at an 8, but unfortunately having to constantly readjust the diaper significantly takes away from its comfort. It might be fine in situations where the wearer is immobile, but it will be problematic for active wearers, in fact even when worn for bedwetting I felt the diaper had become loose by the morning.


Comfort Rating (wet): 6
The Lille SupremFit provides a reasonable level of comfort when wet. The padding resists surface dampness and its “breathable” backsheet reduces heat buildup and clamminess. This diaper’s padding will start to swell and feel heavier when wet but it doesn’t clump or tear easily. Perhaps the biggest problem when it comes to wet comfort is the weakness of the tapes and inability to get a snug fit. As the diaper becomes heavier when wet it sags and will feel uncomfortable as the tapes require constant readjustment just to stay up. For this reason I feel it’s best suited overnight wear or at least for less active wearers where the sagging would be less noticeable, even then it can come loose as noted previously.

3.3 Lille SupremFit Maxi Topsheet and Backsheet


Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 10.4% (topsheet), 10.4% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 2 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 7
Despite what appears to be a lot of padding deterioration the Lille SupremFit padding held up where it mattered most during the dry durability test. It’s biggest problem when it came to durability was the tapes. The measured tape area is deceiving because each tape is formed of a weakly adhesive backing with 3 small stronger hook and loop lines of adhesive. The area of the stronger adhesive only makes up about a fifth of the tape area. The problem with this is that the tapes will easily become detached and slide requiring constant re-adjustment. Also when readjusting the tapes they have a tendency to stick to the backsheet fabric and can tear bits of the material each time they’re removed.


Durability Rating (wet): 6
The state of the Lille diaper and padding when wet was not considerably different than its dry state. The padding itself doesn’t seem any more prone to tearing or clumping when wet than dry and no significant clumping or tearing was observed when testing. Most of the deteriorated padding was in the diaper’s mid-section where it would come in contact with the wearer’s legs and this doesn’t typically have much of an affect on absorbency. Once again this diaper loses its greatest marks as a result of its tapes, which drag along the backsheet resulting in the diaper sagging and easily becoming loose; the waistband seeming has little effect in maintaining a snugger fit.

3.4 Lille SupremFit Maxi Diaper Dry Test Deterioration


Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants):4 cm (1.6"), 4 cm (1.6")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 4 cm (1.6")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 4.5 cm (1.8")

Profile Discretion Rating: 7
The Lille Supremfit Maxi is a relatively small diaper, but it's also somewhat dense and will leave a bit of a “diaper bulge” when worn under most clothing. The padding density could make it more challenging to hide under tighter fitting mesh pants or underwear. Also, the tendency for the diaper to loosen and sit lower in the pants increases the odds of it being spotted. With that in mind I feel it ranks similar to the iD Expert Slip Maxi (PE), providing a decent amount of profile discretion for a highly absorbent diaper.


4.1 Lille SupremFit Maxi Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Lille SupremFit Maxi Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)


Noise

Noise Rating: 9
The Lille SupremFit is about as quiet as they come in terms of tab-style diapers. You may notice some faint crinkling in a very quiet room, but during my testing I almost never noticed it. The backsheet fabric presents relatively little resistance and consequently is unlikely to create much noise when in contact with the fabric of outer clothing. The padding of this diaper is also relatively dense and doesn’t come detached from the backsheet easily, which may also assist in keeping the noise down. Like other cloth-backed diapers the hook and loop fasteners will produce a bit of a “scratchy” noise when removed, so that would be something to keep in mind if changing in a public restroom.


4.3 Lille SupremFit Maxi Noise Profile

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 7
The Lille SupremFit Maxi isn’t remarkable in terms of odor reduction but it isn’t bad either. I put it roughly in line with the Tranquility ATN in this regard. For the most part you won’t notice odors from this diaper but it doesn’t have a snug fit, so that could be a problem for those with fecal incontinence. Otherwise the diaper doesn’t feature any added fragrance, nor does the material emit any distinctive odors.


Attento Tape-Style Adult Diaper Review

 *For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology

Summary

The Attento Tape-Style diaper is a moderate absorbency cloth-backed diaper that is among the most popular brands sold in Japan. The brand has an interesting history as it was originally owned by the P&G Attends brand and still carries some remnants of its history like its baby powder-like fragrance. It’s now owned by Daio Paper Corporation which also makes feminine care and baby products sold almost exclusively in Japan. This diaper features a distinctive tape landing zone with high quality tapes and is incredibly comfortable.

It’s perhaps the softest diaper I’ve ever tried and is often barely noticeable when worn. It owes this to its soft backsheet and padding that has a wide area of coverage but low density. The disadvantage to this is that diaper’s side-panels are easily prone to leaking as they aren’t waterproof and the low density padding offers limited absorbency. Many adult diapers sold in Japan are not meant to be used stand-alone and are instead designed for use with readily-available booster pads. This Attento diaper somewhat fits that category and should be used with a booster pad, but doesn’t explicitly advertise it as a requirement. Japan has developed a rating system for adult diapers with absorbance measured in 150 ml (5 oz) increments. A diaper ranked as a “1” would only absorb up to 150 ml (5 oz) on its own, one ranked at a 2 would absorb up to 300 ml (10 oz), and so on. This Attento diaper was ranked as a 5 meaning expected absorbency of up to 750 ml (25 oz). Generally that would be sufficient for at least a single wetting, but during testing I found this was more the case when sitting or standing and it was more prone to leakage after only a single wetting when lying down.

Key Features:

  • Cloth-like (non-woven backsheet)
  • Large leak guards/leg gathers
  • Repositionable tapes with patterned landing zone
  • Soft/low density padding
  • Refreshing fragrance

Pros:

  • Very comfortable backsheet/padding
  • Easy to use
  • Breathable design

Cons:

  • Poor absorbency
  • No wetness indicator
  • Difficult to find outside of Japan


Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the medium-sized Attento Tape-Style diaper. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Attento
Manufacturer: Daio Paper Corporation
Origin: Japan
Units Per Bag: 30
Cost Per Unit: $$
Dimensions (L x W x H): 52 cm (20.5") x 20 cm (7.9") x 26 cm (10.2")
Weight: 3.2 kg (7.1 lbs)
Available Sizes: S,M,L,LL
Advertised Absorbency: Heavy (750 ml)


1.1 Attento Tape-Style Diaper Packaging


Diaper

Backsheet: Cloth-like (non-woven)
Wetness Indicator: No
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Tab-Style Brief
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 2
Repositionable Tabs: Yes
Outer Color: White (blue line down middle + patterned landing zone)
Inner Color: White (light blue lining/side panels)
Front Waistband: No
Rear Waistband: No
Folded Thickness: 2.0 cm (0.79")
Folded Length: 26 cm (10.2")
Dry Weight: 108 g (3.8 oz)
Fragrance: Scent of freshly washed underwear (baby powder)
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 83 cm (32.7") x 64 cm (25.2") x 33.5 cm (13.19") x 64 (25.2")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 65 cm (25.6") x 33 cm (13") x 18 cm (7.1") x 34 cm (13.4")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 7.5 cm (3") x 17 cm (6.7") x 8 cm (3.2") x 18 cm (7.1")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Total Padding Area: 1713 cm2 (266 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1 x t2): 4 cm (1.6") x 16 (6.3")
Tape (W x L): 3 cm (1.2") x 5 cm (2")


1.2 Attento Tape-Style Diaper

Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 682 ml (24.1 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 692 ml (24.4 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (83 s, 65 s, 75 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 3 cm (1.2")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 64%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 0.4 ml / cm2 (0.09 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 10 ml (0.35 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 3
The Attento Tape-Style diaper performed poorly for surface dampness during the capacity test with the paper towel soaked after only a single wetting. It wasn’t quite as bad during real world testing, so it may be more adept at staying dry with a realistic distribution of moisture after a wetting.


2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test


"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 617 ml (21.8 oz)
Total Wettings: 2 (1 standing, 1 sitting)
Leaked After Sitting: No
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 91%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.36 ml / cm2 (0.08 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 3
The Attento diaper was barely able to avoid leaking on the first wetting and had a noticeable problem with surface dampness. It failed to feel dry even half an hour after the wetting. When seated there was no immediate leak, but moisture did seem to slowly “sweat” out from the cloth-like backsheet and rear leg gathers. I didn’t stop the test on account of the relatively limited moisture permeation, but it was clearly near capacity. On the second wetting, while seated there was a substantial leak through the rear leg gathers. This diaper may work if you have a slower dribble incontinence, but otherwise it shouldn’t be worn without a booster pad.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 467 ml (16.5 oz)
Total Wettings: 1
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 65%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.27 ml / cm2 (0.06 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 1
The Attento adult diaper performed about as poorly as you could expect of an adult diaper when wet while laying down. The padding was quickly overwhelmed with little wicking and the moisture pooled near the rear of the leg gathers. The diaper’s breathable sides are not moisture resistant and the diaper leaked when moisture overran the leg gathers and went through the backsheet on the side. This leak happened almost immediately and more leaks surely would have happened had it been worn longer. It’s pretty clear that this diaper will be prone to leaks for those who were for bed wetting and should only be worn with a booster pad. However, even with a booster pad you can’t rely on the backsheet to provide much protection when laying down and it will almost certainly leak as soon as the padding is saturated.

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

An interesting aspect of Japanese adult diapers is that many require a booster pad and are completely impractical without one. This Attento diaper is one of just a few that doesn’t explicitly require a booster pad. Even so, based on its relatively poor performance in absorbency tests I feel this diaper too is designed for use with a booster pad. Otherwise, the Attento diaper is very comfortable and easy to use. It is also quite durable, which could also be a benefit if used in combination with a highly absorbent booster pad; it’s durability could also be a benefit for more active wearers. If not using a booster pad I believe this diaper would be suitable for moderate incontinence in daily wear as it will still take at least 1 light/moderate wetting without leaking, but wouldn’t be great for heavy wetters. Also, this diaper is way more prone to leaks than plastic-backed diapers because its breathable sides also allow moisture to escape directly through them. For overnight wear, a booster pad would be a must for this diaper, and even then you’d need to be careful due to the ease of leakage through the sides. I wouldn’t recommend this diaper for bedwetters, but I feel that with a booster pad it might work well for use during the day, particularly if comfort is a priority over overall absorbency.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Attento Tape-Style diaper features a cloth-like backsheet with hook and loop (Velcro-like) fasteners and a dedicated landing zone. The tapes can be fastened or refastened anywhere on the landing zone. They are of high quality and won’t degrade with usage.


3.1 Attento Tape-Style Diaper Fastener


Ease-of-Use Rating: 9
This Attento diaper is very user friendly. It features the most convenient tape system I’ve ever seen. It’s quite easy to achieve and retain a comfortable snug fit. The landing zone on this diaper also features numbers and marks that make it fast/easy to consistently get a good fit. Perhaps this diaper’s only downside in terms of ease-of-use is the lack of a wetness indicator (instead it has an alignment line that runs down the center).

3.2 Attento Tape-Style Diaper Fit


Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 10
The comfort provided by these Attento diapers is amazing. Similar to the Certainty Adult Diaper, this diaper feels well suited to warm weather and dissipates heat quickly. Unlike the plastic-backed Certainty diaper, this diaper has a cloth-like backsheet. The softness of the backsheet and padding is incredible, I’d easily rank it among the most soft/comfortable diapers on the market. The backsheet and padding also have a lot of give and won’t result in chaffing. Nor is the padding particularly vulnerable to tearing or clumping. This diaper feels very light owing to the low density padding and it was barely noticeable during the durability test.


Comfort Rating (wet): 8
The wet comfort rating for the Attento diaper somewhat depends on how large a first wetting it receives. The diaper is able to handle a moderate wetting without leaking and remarkably even the obvious surface dampness issues won’t be much of an issue if it isn’t flooded on the first wetting. When tested with only a moderate wetting it felt quite comfortable, nearly as much as in its dry state; however, when tested with a larger wetting it was noticeably damp and uncomfortable. I scored it relatively highly for wet comfort because the diaper seems designed to be worn with a booster pad for those with heavier incontinence and if it’s not saturated it’s about as comfortable as it is when it’s dry.


3.3 Tena Super Stretch Topsheet and Backsheet


Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 6.5% (topsheet), 6.9% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 5 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 8
The Attento diaper has a high quality construct and appears to be made with some of the better materials on the market. The padding has a soft/fluffy feel to it, but, surprisingly, it is held together such that it is resilient to deterioration when dry. It’s possible that the low density of the padding material reduces the tendency for the type of shifting that leads to tears/clumping. The tapes/landing zone are also well made and can be refastened multiple times without damaging the diaper. During the dry durability test there was some deterioration, but none to the key parts of the padding. What’s interesting is that from a wearer perspective the diaper didn’t feel any different at the end of the test than it did at the start. So all things considered, I rank this diaper a little higher than what might otherwise be expected given its relatively poor durability test performance.


Durability Rating (wet): 6
Due to the low absorbency it’s unlikely you’d ever wear this Attento diaper long enough to assess durability when wet (unless you use a booster pad). It should be changed after a single wetting if not using a booster pad. Even so it was still assessed for wet durability and performed reasonably well, with no signs of clumping but a little bit of parallel tearing. In the shake test the padding was shown to be fairly resilient when wet and this was confirmed during real world testing. Moreover, the tapes and construction of  this diaper can easily take the weight of a wetting without any hints of sagging.


3.4 Attento Tape-Style Diaper Dry Test Deterioration


Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 5.5 cm (2.2")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 8 cm (3.2"), 4 cm (1.6")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 4.5 cm (1.8")

Profile Discretion Rating: 8
The Attento Tape-Style diaper is relatively easy to conceal under clothing. The diaper itself is relatively thin and flexible so any “bulge” could be somewhat kept in check under underwear or mesh pants. Perhaps its primary downside when it comes to profile discretion is its large surface area, which means padding can bunch up at front and rear of the diaper. Also good to keep in mind is its relatively light absorbency and the impact that could have on discretion.


4.1 Attento Tape-Style Diaper Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Attento Tape-Style Diaper Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

Noise

Noise Rating: 9
This Attento diaper is incredibly quiet. You won’t notice the noise from it at all when walking, even under thin pants. When sitting/standing there will be a very slight crinkling sound but it is mostly muffled. The padding is light and fluffy and the diaper has a lot of surface area, which would typically lead to a lot more noise. Not in this case, perhaps due to the ultra soft/flexible backsheet and padding. Otherwise, the only thing you need to watch out for in terms of noise with this diaper would be the obvious “scratching” sound when removing the hook and loop fasteners.

4.3 Attento Tape-Style Diaper Noise Profile


Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 9
The Attento Type Style Diaper is a rarity in that it has an added fragrance. Translated from Japanese it is considered to be the fragrance of “freshly washed underwear”; I’m not sure how to quantify that but personally it smells a lot like baby powder (perhaps the fragrance of Attends diapers from years past). In terms of odor reduction, this diaper performed surprisingly well considering its tendency for surface dampness with odors rarely being an issue. The very breathable design also seems to reduce factors like sweating that can contribute to odors. I consider odor reduction a strength in this diaper and consequently have ranked it a little higher than might otherwise be justified given the surface dampness issues.