Friday, 22 April 2022

ABU PeekABU / Simple Ultra Adult Diaper Review

*For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology. For a list of all product reviews see the Product Index.


Summary

The ABU PeekABU is a high absorbency ABDL-focused diaper with a plastic backsheet and printed landing zone. This diaper also comes in an identical form without the print as the ABU Simple Ultras. It’s imported by ABUniverse, which is clearly focused on that market over the incontinence market; not a big fan of the branding but it serves its niche. They make up the top of the ABUniverse plastic-backed line up in terms of absorbency and are only slightly lower than the newer cloth-backed ABU AlphaGatorz or Little Kings but well above the ABU Space or BareBum diapers. In terms of design, it’s remarkably similar to the NorthShore MegaMax with standout features like a thick plastic backsheet and honeycomb-textured padding.

In terms of comfort, this diaper ranks highly, though, like the MegaMax, it’s highly susceptible to initial pooling during a wetting. Its sizing also seems to be a full size smaller than the MegaMax, with the medium ABU PeekABU being equivalent to small MegaMax. Even so, it should consistently take up to 3 wettings before leakage would be a concern. With a very high unit price, this diaper is more of a novelty than one I’d consider for practical purposes. For that reason, I think most will find its primary selling point for the unit cost is the character prints, otherwise there are cheaper more performant diapers like the BetterDry available.

Key Features:

  • White plastic backsheet
  • Printed cartoon landing zone
  • Standing inner leak barriers
  • Dual waistbands
  • Repositionable tapes

Pros:

  • High level of absorbency
  • Very strong tapes/durable
  • Comfortable padding
  • Very good price/quality ratio

Cons:

  • Very high unit cost
  • Topsheet pooling
  • Not discreet

 

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the medium-sized ABU PeekABU Diaper. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: ABU (by ABUniverse)
Manufacturer: Weifang Mimosa Personalcare Technology
Origin: China
Units Per Bag: 10
Cost Per Unit: $$$$
Dimensions (L x W x H): 26 cm (10.2") x 17.5 cm (6.9") x 24 cm (9.5")
Weight: 1.98 kg (4.35 lbs)
Available Sizes: M, L, XL, XL+
Advertised Absorbency: 6250 ml

1.1 ABU PeekABU Packaging

Diaper

Backsheet: Plastic (poly)
Wetness Indicator: No
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Tab-Style Brief
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 2
Repositionable Tabs: Yes
Outer Color: White (playful cartoon on landing zone)
Inner Color: White (bright blue rectangle in middle padding)
Front Waistband: Yes
Rear Waistband: Yes
Folded Thickness: 3 cm (1.2")
Folded Length: 25 cm (9.8")
Dry Weight: 183 g (6.5 oz)
Fragrance: None (slight papery smell)
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 78 cm (30.7") x 64 cm (25.2") x 32 cm (12.6") x 62 cm (24.4")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 66 cm (26") x 31 cm (12.2") x 18 cm (7.1") x 34.5 cm (13.6")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 6.5 cm (2.6") x 11 cm (4.3") x 8.3 cm (3.3") x 17 cm (6.7")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Semicircle, Semicircle
Total Padding Area: 1611 cm2 (250 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1 x t2): 4.5 cm (1.8") x 14 cm (5.5")
Tape (W x L): 4.5 cm (1.8") x 14 cm (5.5")

 

1.2 ABU PeekABU Diaper


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 2317 ml (81.7 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 2417 ml (85.3 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (51 s, 65 s, 77 s, 87 s, 92 s, 87 s, 85 s, 99 s, 92 s, 110 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 8 cm (3.2")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 92%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 1.44 ml / cm2 (0.33 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 100 ml (3.53 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 9

The ABU PeekABU has a padding construction that’s very similar to the NorthShore MegaMax and the lab test performance demonstrated this clearly. There was almost no surface dampness apparent until the 4th wetting. However, this comes with a heavy caveat in that the moisture repellent topsheet that does such a great job at preventing moisture from leaking out will also slow its absorption leading to pooling and leaks well before it reaches theoretical absorption.




2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test

"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 1542 ml (54.4 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing, 3 sitting)
Leaked After Sitting: No
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 61%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.96 ml / cm2 (0.22 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 9
The ABU PeekABU diaper performed strongly in the standing-sitting test. The first wetting while standing was easily absorbed with no sign of leakage. However, there was a substantial amount of momentary pooling before absorption. The second wetting while seated was again quickly and easily absorbed. As expected, there was once again quite a bit of initial pooling but the large padding area and effective leak guard prevented any leakage. At this point there was quite a bit of swelling but the padding remained intact without clumping or tearing. The third wetting was again fully absorbed with no signs of leakage. Aside from the initial pooling the surface dampness wasn’t particularly notable after it was fully absorbed. On the fourth wetting there was considerable pooling at the front of the diaper and it pushed up under the right side resulting in a significant leak below. The ABU PeekABU diaper did absorb a decent amount at this point, comparable to the NorthShore MegaMax and I feel it will generally absorb at least 3 wettings during daily wear. Were it not for the slow absorption rate and tendency for pooling I’m sure it could absorb far more.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 1642 ml (57.9 oz)
Total Wettings: 4
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 77%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 1.02 ml / cm2 (0.23 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 9

The ABU PeekABU performed very well when lying down. The first wetting was easily absorbed with no signs of leakage, although there was initial pooling and a lot of moisture rolled off the padding and funneled toward its midsection. Once absorbed there was some swelling but little sign of surface dampness. The second wetting behaved much like the first, a bit slow in the initial absorption with noticeable pooling running across the padding. The shear padding and underlying absorbency was able to handle it no problem. Once absorbed, the padding swelled further but didn’t have the squishiness of others like the Tykables Little Rawrs or Rearz Barnyard. Likewise, the third wetting was absorbed quickly but with a fair amount of initial pooling. It felt as though the front leak guards may be overrun but they held their ground and there was no obvious leakage. On the fourth wetting there was a substantial amount of pooling near the rear leak guards and a small but noticeable amount of leakage out the rear leg gathers before it was fully absorbed. It wasn’t a huge leak, but enough that it would leave the bedding damp. I called the test at that, but this diaper had absorbed an impressive amount by that point, comparable to the BetterDry/Crinlkz or ConfiDry 24/7 diapers. Were it not for the relatively slow absorption rate I’m sure it could have absorbed more, a trait it shares with the NorthShore MegaMax. Overall, I feel this diaper will easily satisfy the needs of bedwetters, comfortably taking at least 3 wettings before leakage might be a concern and I wouldn’t be surprised if some find it will last up to 5 wettings when lying down.

 

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

The ABU PeekABU is a full featured diaper and performed well when it came to both daily wear and bedwetting. It’s very similar, but not identical to the NorthShore MegaMax. It has the same dense honeycomb padding texture, a very similar thick plastic landing zone and the same incredibly adhesive tapes. The plastic backsheet is generally similar to many of the other ABDL imports from China, with a smooth but “heavy” feel to it. Where it differs from the MegaMax is mainly in sizing, the medium-sized ABU PeekABU fits nearly the same as the small-sized MegaMax. In fact in terms of padding area the ABU PeekABU was slightly smaller and also had a smaller waistband. In spite of that, this diaper did prove a little more absorbent than the small-sized NorthShore MegaMax, so it likely had a little more packed into its padding. By far my greatest complaint with both diapers is that they are highly susceptible to moisture pooling and this causes them to leak well short of their theoretical absorbency. When worn during daily wear this would certainly be an issue if wet while seated, with pooled moisture likely to overrun the leak guards. When standing or walking you may find it can handle a few more wettings as the pooling will eventually be absorbed if no pressure is applied for long enough. Once it is absorbed, it does a great job at resisting surface dampness and avoiding pressout. During daily wear, it should be good for at least 3 wettings before leakage. The pooling problems are about the same when worn for bed wetting. I expected it to be less of an issue in this instance because gravity usually takes moisture to the rear padding and there’s less pressure in general. Yet, it still seemed to pool near the rear leg gathers and with a significant amount of unused rear padding. Again, I feel this diaper would be good for up to 3 wettings when lying down but after that you’d have to be careful. It will leak far sooner if you’re a side-sleeper. Generally, this should be enough for most bedwetting needs if you aren’t deterred by the cost.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 8

The ABU PeekABU has all the features you should need when dealing with bowel incontinence. The plastic-backsheet will resist odors and waistbands/inner leak guards should keep things contained. It has a generous amount of rear padding. That said, it still suffers from moisture pooling and for this reason I can’t quite give it a perfect score as it may leak sooner than expected.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The ABU PeekABU features a white plastic backsheet with tapes and a printed landing zone. The landing zone contains playful printed characters that can help with placement. The tapes are wide and of a strongly adhesive material that is highly unlikely to become detached. The tapes are both refastenable and repositionable so can be removed and reapplied multiple times.

 

3.1 ABU PeekABU Fastener
 

Ease-of-Use Rating: 9

The ABU PeekABU is a user-friendly diaper. It’s easy to get a snug fit with the strong tapes and dual waistbands. It’s fairly easy to detach and reattach, though the tapes hold so strongly it may be an issue for those with a weakened grip. I give this diaper a slight edge over the NorthShore MegaMax for ease of use mainly because the character prints in the landing zone make it slightly easier to get a consistent fit. However, it may not be the best in a caregiver setting, because it lacks a wetness indicator. Moreover, the bag doesn't have easy tear seams, but I didn't count that against it. Aside from that, I can’t find any significant faults in this diaper and it certainly earns a high ease-of-use rating.

3.2 ABU PeekABU Diaper Fit

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 9

The ABU PeekABU is quite comfortable in its dry state. Its padding initially starts off somewhat firm, though not uncomfortably so, but actually softens a bit with wear. The backsheet plastic is a bit thick and not quite as soft as the Forma-Care X-Plus or Tena Slip Active Fit Ultima, but smooth and not prone to chafing. The stiff plastic landing zone is probably the greatest detraction from what otherwise is a very comfortable diaper. In terms of consistency, the dry padding won’t clump or tear and it has a generous amount of coverage. As expected, this diaper performed very similarly to the NorthShore MegaMax when it came to dry comfort, it’s not the most comfortable on the market but certainly among the top performers.


Comfort Rating (wet): 10

The ABU PeekABU is very comfortable when wet and again very similar to the NorthShore MegaMax. It does have some issues with pooling on the initial wetting, but once absorbed surface dampness isn’t much of an issue as the topsheet is very effective at locking in moisture. Like the MegaMax, the tapes hold up exceptionally well and sagging is not an issue. It also differs from the Rearz Barnyard Elite Hybrid or Bambino Karnevalee in that the padding remains relatively firm when wet. Moreover, even though the padding swells considerably it doesn’t clump or tear and actually becomes a bit softer when wet, similar to the BetterDry/Crinklz or NorthShore Supreme.

3.3 ABU PeekABU Topsheet and Backsheet


Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 13.7% (topsheet), 18.1% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 2 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 8
The ABU PeekABU has some of the strongest tapes on the market and performed very well when it came to dry durability. There was little in the way of padding clumping or tearing, though there was a bit of padding collapse between the legs. This diaper retained a snug fit throughout testing and if it could be worn discreetly would be excellent for daily wear. Moreover, the padding retains a good grip on the backsheet. It’s not quite up there with the NorthShore Supreme or Drylife SlipSuper in this regard, but still among better products on the market in terms of durability.


Durability Rating (wet): 9

The ABU PeekABU was again almost identical to the NorthShore MegaMax when it came to wet durability. The padding retains a reasonable degree of firmness even when wet and I never noticed any significant signs of clumping or tearing when wet. The tapes are also incredibly strong and will hold a significant amount of weight. I feel this diaper would be well suited for daily wear in terms of durability, though it’s very thick and discretion would be more of a concern.

3.4 ABU PeekABU Dry Test Deterioration

Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 4 cm (1.6"), 5 cm (2")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 6.5 cm (2.6"), 7.5 cm (3")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 6 cm (2.4")

Profile Discretion Rating: 5

The ABU PeekABU is a large diaper and presents with a clear diaper bulge at the front and rear. It has very strong tapes and a relatively snug fit, so it’s quite resistant to sagging and that does help with its profile presence. On the other hand, the printed characters on the front are anything but discrete and will be obvious if seen under clothing. I’d generally avoid wearing this diaper for going out as it will require a lot of work to conceal.


4.1 ABU PeekABU Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 ABU PeekABU Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 


Noise

Noise Rating: 5

The ABU PeekABU isn’t the noisiest diapers on the market, helped by the relatively firm padding that resists separating from the backsheet. Yet, like the Forsite AM/PM or NorthShore MegaMax, its primary source is the thick crinkly plastic landing zone on the front. The tapes also produce a lot of noise when removed thanks to very strong adhesiveness.

4.3 ABU PeekABU Noise Profile


Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 8
The ABU PeekABU performed well when it came to odor reduction. I rarely noticed odors from this diaper, largely owing to its construction and moisture repellent topsheet. I don’t think it’s quite in the ranks of the best in this regard but still ranks highly.


Want to give the ABU PeekABU a try?

Help us continue to produce quality reviews by making a purchase through our affiliate link. With every purchase this blog will earn a small amount of commission at no extra cost to the purchaser.

Sunday, 27 March 2022

Forma-Care X-Plus Adult Diaper Review

*For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology. For a list of all product reviews see the Product Index.

 


Summary

The Forma-Care X-Plus is a premium European diaper with a distinct bright blue plastic backsheet and dual waistbands. It’s produced by the German medical supplies company unizell Medicare GmbH and comes in at the top of their range in terms of absorbency. This diaper is largely sold in the European market and, unfortunately, not widely available internationally. It features a high level of absorbency, consistently taking 2 wettings without any sign of leakage. This puts it a little below the most absorbent diapers on the market, but it comes in way above most diapers at a comparable price range.

During testing I found this diaper to be highly durable and comfortable. It will easily satisfy the needs of bedwetters and is great for wear around the house. Its thickness may make it a challenging wear when out but it has quality tapes and won’t easily come loose. The price-to-value ratio of this diaper is remarkable, with its pricing only slightly above many brands sold in North American stores like the Depend Protection with Tabs. The blue backsheet reminds me a bit of the Wellness Briefs Original, but that’s where the similarity stops. This is a superior diaper that showed no sign of pinhole leaks. I highly recommend the Forma-Care X-Plus to those who are able to pick up a pack.

Key Features:

  • Bright blue plastic backsheet
  • Standing inner leak barriers
  • Dual waistbands
  • Refastenable tapes

Pros:

  • Snug/comfortable fit
  • Highly durable
  • Great absorbency/leak protection
  • Highly odor resistant
  • Very good price/quality ratio

Cons:

  • Limited availability
  • Hard to hide under clothing

 

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the medium-sized Forma-Care X-Plus Diaper. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Forma-Care
Manufacturer: unizell Medicare GmbH
Origin: Europe
Units Per Bag: 18
Cost Per Unit: $$
Dimensions (L x W x H): 38 cm (15") x 17 cm (6.7") x 24 cm (9.5")
Weight: 3.4 kg (7.6 lbs)
Available Sizes: S, M, L
Advertised Absorbency: Overnight

1.1 Forma-Care X-Plus Packaging

Diaper

Backsheet: Plastic (poly)
Wetness Indicator: Yes (darker blue text, fades when wet)
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Tab-Style Brief
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 2
Repositionable Tabs: No
Outer Color: Bright blue (almost fluorescent)
Inner Color: White (blue inner lining)
Front Waistband: Yes
Rear Waistband: Yes
Folded Thickness: 2.3 cm (0.9")
Folded Length: 26 cm (10.2")
Dry Weight: 183 g (6.5 oz)
Fragrance: No
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 81 cm (31.9") x 62 cm (24.4") x 29.5 cm (11.6") x 58 cm (23")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 64 cm (25.2") x 31 cm (12.2") x 17 cm (6.7") x 34 cm (13.4")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 7 cm (2.8") x 16 cm (6.3") x 8.5 cm (3.4") x 20 cm (7.8")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Semicircle, Semicircle
Total Padding Area: 1652 cm2 (256 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1 x t2): 6 cm (2.4") x 20 cm (7.8")
Tape (W x L): 2.5 cm (1") x 4 cm (1.6")

1.2 Forma-Care X-Plus Diaper


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 1467 ml (51.8 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 1492 ml (52.6 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (56 s, 58 s, 66 s, 67 s, 79 s, 87 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 6 cm (2.4")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 93%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 0.89 ml / cm2 (0.20 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 25 ml (0.88 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 6

The Forma-Care X-Plus performed similarly to the Abena M4 when it came to surface dampness in the capacity test. There was a bit of surface dampness noticeable after the first wetting and non-insignificant amount in subsequent wettings. In real world testing the surface dampness was hardly noticeable, perhaps owing to the breathable design and padding coverage.



2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test

"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 1342 ml (47.3 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing, 2 sitting)
Leaked After Sitting: No
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 94%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.81 ml / cm2 (0.18 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 8
The Forma-Care X-Plus quickly and easily absorbed first wetting while standing. At this point there was still a large area of dry padding at the front and rear. There was no indication of any leakage upon sitting a few minutes later and surface dampness was neglectable. On the second wetting there was more moisture wicking up the rear of the diaper but it was absorbed quickly again with no sign of leakage. In spite of apparent surface dampness in the previous capacity test it wasn’t particularly noticeable during this test and the diaper maintained a high degree of comfort. On the third wetting moisture pushed out through the front leg gathers and leaked out from the wings. At this point the rear padding still felt relatively dry and comfortable but the front padding was clearly saturated. The padding had definitely swelled but was still in good shape with no noticeable clumping or tearing. I finished the test at this point because there was clearly a leak. Overall, I feel the Forma-Care X-Plus diaper will easily absorb 2 wettings during daily wear before leakage would be a concern, but 3 would definitely be pushing it.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 1167 ml (41.2 oz)
Total Wettings: 3
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 95%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.71 ml / cm2 (0.16 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 8

The Forma-Care X-Plus performed well when lying down. There was not so much as a hint of leakage after the first wetting and the moisture was absorbed quickly. The padding continued to feel comfortable and there was still a relatively large area of dry padding. The second wetting was again absorbed quite quickly but there was lingering surface dampness at the rear padding. However, once again there was no sign of leakage and the diaper still felt relatively comfortable at this point. By the third wetting the padding had swelled quite a bit, but still felt quite soft in a way. At this point there was a bit of leakage through the rear leg gathers and I called the test at that. There was still a little dry padding at the front of the diaper but the remainder felt quite saturated and likely would have leaked more if sitting down afterwards. Overall, I feel this diaper would be a reliable choice for bedwetting, taking at least 2 wettings before leakage would be a concern.

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

The Forma-Care X-Plus is a very well rounded diaper with a high level of absorbency, comfort and durability. It feels like a great diaper for both daily and overnight wear, however, it is also pretty thick and will stand out under most clothing. When worn for bedwetting I never experienced any leaks from this diaper, even when heavy wettings were experienced. Often, when waking up in the morning any dampness was imperceivable and I couldn’t tell if I’d wet during the night. Testing while lying down confirmed its absorption, with the Forma-Care absorbing a full 2 wettings and a likely capacity of 2~3 wettings before leakage. While this doesn’t put this diaper at the top of the premium diapers for absorbency I found it to be remarkably consistent in quality and absorbency. Compared with diapers with a thicker plastic backsheet like the Forsite AM/PM or NorthShore MegaMax I found the backsheet of this one to be softer, more flexible and more comfortable for extended wear. With that in mind, the Forma-Care X-Plus has a smaller “European” fit, so if you typically sit at the upper end of medium in other diapers you may be best to go large for this one. In terms of daily wear this diaper proved remarkably durable. I never had any of the tapes come loose during testing and the padding had virtually no clumping or tearing during both wet and dry wear. Moreover, I didn’t experience any chaffing or skin irritation with wear. This diaper is also among the quieter plastic-backed diapers on the market, though a bit noisier when wet. Perhaps the most significant downside of this diaper is that it will stand out under most clothing and could be difficult to wear discreetly when out of the house. In this regard its padding is relatively thick and forms an obvious diaper bulge at the front and rear and the bright blue (almost fluorescent) backsheet color is glaringly obvious. But if you can make it work I feel this is a diaper you can feel confidently protected in when out and about.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 10

The Forma-Care X-Plus has all the features you’d be looking for when it comes to bowel incontinence. It has a plastic-backsheet and is incredibly odor resistant. Moreover, the dual waistbands retain a snug fit and it is not prone to sagging. It also has extensive rear padding coverage and standing inner leak guards, which is critical for containment. Overall, I can’t find any faults in this diaper in this regard and thus the perfect score.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Forma-Care X-Plus has a bright blue plastic backsheet with a double-tape mechanism. The tapes cannot be repositioned after applying the diaper, but they can be refastened any number of times. The tapes are relatively small but high quality and hold very well even after multiple refastenings.

3.1 Forma-Care X-Plus Fastener
 

Ease-of-Use Rating: 8

The Forma-Care X-Plus has a compact European fitting, so you may need to go up a size for this diaper compared with others if you tend to have a tighter fit. During testing I found it was very easy to achieve and maintain a snug fit with the Forma-Care X-Plus and I was impressed with the softness of the plastic backsheet. The dual waistbands help with maintaining a snug fit while keeping it flexible. It’s also very easy to remove when it’s time for a change. It has a wetness indicator (blue text down the middle that fades when wet), which will also be helpful in some settings. The only downsides I would say are that the tapes are a bit on the small size so may be tough for some to reattach and the blue text of the wetness indicator doesn’t show much of a contrast compared with the bright blue backsheet. Another thing I didn’t factor into this rating is that the bag doesn’t appear to have any easy tear seams; although I didn’t find it particularly difficult to open in any case.

3.2 Forma-Care X-Plus Diaper Fit

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 10

The Forma-Care X-Plus is amongst the most comfortable diapers I’ve tested with a number of similarities to the Tena Slip Active Fit Maxi or Molicare Slip Maxi. I actually found the fit of the Forma-Care to be a bit better than that of the Tena diaper. The backsheet is very smooth and perhaps the softest of any plastic-back diaper tested thus far or at least similar to the Molicare Slip Maxi. It’s notably different from the ABDL-oriented imports from China like the NorthShore MegaMax or Forsite AM/PM, which have a thicker, stiffer backsheet; I found this diaper to be more comfortable in comparison. It has a snug fit and flexible comfortable dual waistbands.The thick padding, while perhaps not the softest on the market, is still very soft, more so than the Drylife SlipSuper or ConfiDry 24/7. For a plastic-backed diaper it was also surprisingly resistant to overheating and never felt particularly clammy. Overall, I couldn’t find any downsides, thus a perfect score.


Comfort Rating (wet): 9

The Forma-Care X-Plus is a very comfortable diaper when wet, not unlike the Tena Slip Active Fit Maxi or Molicare Slip Maxi. It’s not quite as absorbent as some of the other premium diapers in the market, but it has a smooth and relatively breathable plastic-backsheet and the padding is very soft in both its wet and dry state. Personally, I found these diapers less susceptible to clamminess than those with a denser plastic and landing zone like the NorthShore MegaMax. Also, I found it a little less susceptible to rear surface dampness than some of the cloth-backed diapers like the Seni Super Plus. Moreover, the padding stays well intact and doesn’t clump or tear. I think there could still be some small improvements in terms of absorbency/surface dampness that would make this diaper even more comfortable in the wet state, but otherwise it’s about as good as it gets for comfort when wet.

3.3 Forma-Care X-Plus Topsheet and Backsheet


Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 6.1% (topsheet), 6.6% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 5 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 9
The Forma-Care X-Plus was remarkably durable during the dry durability test. At the end of the test there was little in the way of padding deterioration with most occurring in non-critical sections, particularly where it would typically fold inward between the legs. During testing there was never any sign of clumping or tearing and the tapes lost very little adhesiveness, even after multiple re-attachments. The wetness indicator was little affected by sweat or smaller dribbles. Moreover, this diaper retained a snug fit throughout testing with no sign of loosening. There was still a little padding deterioration so I couldn’t quite give it a perfect score, but I put the Forma-Care X-Plus on par with the Tena Slip Active Fit Ultima when it comes to dry durability.


Durability Rating (wet): 9

The Forma-Care X-Plus performed well in terms of wet durability. There were never any signs of padding clumping and only small tears in the front wing padding. The backsheet itself proved highly resilient with no leaks or perspiration getting through from the wet padding. The tapes held up remarkably well with no sign of failure under weight and there was little perceivable sagging from this diaper; it retained its snug fit in both its wet and dry state. It’s not among the most absorbent diapers in the market, but provides a good level of protection and works well for daily wear. I can’t quite say this diaper provided the wet durability of the Drylife SlipSuper or NorthShore Supreme, but it wasn’t far off and more durable than the Molicare Slip Maxi/slightly more than the Attends Slip Regular Plus 10M.

3.4 Forma-Care X-Plus Dry Test Deterioration

Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 4.5 cm (1.8")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 6 cm (2.4"), 5 cm (2")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 4.5 cm (1.8"), 3.5 cm (1.4")

Profile Discretion Rating: 5

The Forma-Care X-Plus presents a clear diaper bulge at both its front and rear and I wouldn’t recommend this diaper for discretion without careful consideration for clothing. Otherwise, it’s not particularly prone to sagging so the bulge wouldn’t increase much when wet. It certainly feels like a better one for around the house or bedwetting, though if you can make it work it’s actually very good for active wear. This diaper also features a bright blue backsheet that could prove very visible through thinner clothing or above the waistline.


4.1 Forma-Care X-Plus Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Forma-Care X-Plus Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 


Noise

Noise Rating: 7

The amount of noise produced by the Forma-Care X-Plus very much depends on its condition. In its dry state I noticed very little noise during wear, the padding stays in pretty close alignment with the backsheet and dampens noise. However, when the diaper is wet the padding and backsheet can separate a little resulting in considerably more crinkling with movements.

4.3 Forma-Care X-Plus Noise Profile

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 10
The Forma-Care X-Plus diaper is incredibly resistant to odors and very similar to the Tena Slip Active Fit Maxi in that respect. The snug fit and plastic backsheet definitely helps, but the padding in particular seems to have some properties that lock in odors. It isn’t the best in terms of surface dampness, but even then that didn’t seem to matter. I have no complaints when it comes to odor control from the Forma-Care X-Plus and thus a perfect score.


Want to give the Forma-Care X-Plus a try?

Help us continue to produce quality reviews by making a purchase through our Forma-Care X-Plus Medium or Forma-Care X-Plus Large affiliate link. With every purchase this blog will earn a small amount of commission at no extra cost to the purchaser.