Saturday, 15 July 2023

Duchesse Med Flexi Slip Adult Diaper Review

*For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology. For a list of all product reviews see the Product Index.


 

Summary

The Duchesse Flexi Slip is a cloth-back, high absorbency adult diaper sold in Muller drugstores throughout Central Europe. This diaper advertises as being absorbent up to 1100 ml (37.2 oz) and actually came out quite close to the advertised range during testing (a rarity for diapers that advertise a specific capacity). It’s marketed as Medium/Large (M/L), but in reality I found the fit to be more like a medium. As far as I can tell, the M/L is the only size available for this diaper so the target market is limited to those with a waist size of around 76 ~ 100 cm (30 ~ 40”).


This diaper seems to have a high quality construction with a very comfortable/breathable design. During testing I found that I often barely noticed this diaper and couldn’t tell if it was wet or not in the morning. It also proved fairly durable overall with little padding clumping or tearing during testing. As far as diapers that can be bought from a regular drugstore go, I was pretty impressed with this one and would recommend giving it a try where it can be found at a good price.


Key Features:

  • Cloth-like backsheet
  • Repositionable tapes
  • Standing inner leak barriers
  • Wetness indicator

Pros:

  • Highly breathable/comfortable
  • Good absorbency
  • Discreet

Cons:

  • Limited sizing/availability
  • Moisture sweats through backsheet
  • Gap at the rear waist

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the large/medium-sized Duchesse Med Flexi Slip Diaper. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Duchesse
Manufacturer: Muller Handels AG Schweiz
Origin: EU
Units Per Bag: 10
Cost Per Unit: $$
Dimensions (L x W x H): 21 cm (8.3") x 16 cm (6.3") x 22 cm (8.7")
Weight: 1 kg (2.2 lbs)
Available Sizes: M/L
Advertised Absorbency: 1100 ml


1.1 Duchesse Flexi Slip Packaging

Diaper

Backsheet: Cloth-like (non-woven)
Wetness Indicator: Yes (two yellow lines down middle, blue when wet)
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Tab-Style Brief
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 2
Repositionable Tabs: Yes
Outer Color: White
Inner Color: White
Front Waistband: No
Rear Waistband: No
Folded Thickness: 2.5 cm (0.98")
Folded Length: 21 cm (8.3")
Dry Weight: 100 g (3.5 oz)
Fragrance: No
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 78 cm (30.7") x 67 cm (26.4") x 30 cm (11.8") x 66 cm (26")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 60 cm (23.6") x 22 cm (8.7") x 15 cm (5.9") x 25 cm (9.8")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 3.5 cm (1.4") x 10 cm (3.9") x 5 cm (2") x 13 cm (5.1")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Total Padding Area: 1100 cm2 (171 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1 x t2): 2 cm (0.8") x 12 cm (4.7")
Tape (W x L): 5 cm (2") x 3 cm (1.2")

 

1.2 Duchesse Flexi Slip Diaper


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 1235 ml (43.6 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 1250 ml (44.1 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (53 s, 48 s, 56 s, 56 s, 59 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 4 cm (1.6")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 94%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 1.12 ml / cm2 (0.26 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 15 ml (0.53 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 7

The Duchesse Flexi Slip showed decent resistance against surface dampness. In the lab test there was no dampness after the first wetting and only a little after the second wetting. During real world testing it also proved resilient to surface dampness, with only very brief pooling and it continued to feel comfortable and breathable when wet.


2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test

"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 875 ml (30.7 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing, 2 sitting)
Leaked After Sitting: No
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 73%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.80 ml / cm2 (0.18 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 7
The Duchesse Flexi Slip performed reasonably well when tested while standing and sitting. The first wetting while standing was quickly absorbed, though with a little pooling and a “squishy” sensation at first. Once fully absorbed the padding firmed up again and there were no hints of leakage. Nor was there any sign of leakage upon sitting shortly afterward. The second wetting while seated also didn’t leak. This time the moisture pressed well up the front of the diaper and almost reached the sides. I felt it came close to leaking at this point but not quite there and there was considerably more pooling. Even so, the rear padding was still mostly dry and it didn’t seem like much moisture made it to the back. The diaper continued to feel comfortable at this time. On the final wetting the front moisture finally overran the leak guards and spilled out into the wings. Some of it was actually redirected toward the rear padding but there was a substantial leak as well and I ended the test with that. Even so, at the end of the test there was still a substantial amount of dry padding at the rear. Were it able to channel moisture better when seated it certainly would have performed better. In general, I’d expect this diaper to absorb 1~2 wettings during daily wear before leaking.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 925 ml (32.6 oz)
Total Wettings: 3
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 94%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.84 ml / cm2 (0.19 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 8

The Duchesse Flexi Slip performed decently when tested while lying down. The first wetting was absorbed quickly with minimal surface dampness, though I did sense a bit of brief pooling. Once absorbed it was hardly noticeable and there was still a lot of dry padding. The second wetting was again fully absorbed though it felt a little closer to saturation by this point. Moisture pushed up near the front wing but was still restricted enough and there was enough dry padding left that there weren’t any leaks. Once fully absorbed the diaper continued to feel comfortable. The padding felt a little squishier than some comparable diapers, but not so much so as to be particularly susceptible to pressout. There was finally some leakage on the third wetting with a moderate leak of moisture out through the rear leg gathers and I called the test at that. In spite of that, the diaper remained remarkably comfortable and there was even still a bit of dry padding at the front. I didn’t notice too much in the way of surface dampness either. I’d expect this diaper to perform decently when worn for bedwetting and generally should absorb 1~2 wettings before leakage might be a concern.

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

I found the Duchesse Flexi Slip exceeded expectations when testing for daily wear and bedwetting. In both scenarios it was more than sufficient to take a full wetting without any signs of leakage and in both posture tests it actually didn’t leak until the 3rd wetting. Even so, I’d be worried about it leaking after the second wetting during daily wear and I did notice some “sweat”/microleaks through the backsheet. The padding also takes on a somewhat "squishy" feel when wet but it's more like the feeling of thicker padding than that of a sponge. I feel it’s a little better suited for overnight wear and wouldn’t be surprised if it consistently took 2 wettings without leaking in that case. When used for daily wear, I found it was susceptible to microleaks, but only after the second wetting, particularly when subject to pressout (like when seated). It seems some moisture was able to sweat out through imperfections in the backsheet, though still nowhere near the level found in the Wellness Briefs Original. This sweat-like leakage felt more like the type that’s typical for cloth-backed diapers, where imperfections and osmosis can lead to moisture leaking through a seemingly solid backsheet. In terms of skin health, these diapers were great. They remain super breathable, even when wet and I never noticed significant irritation or discomfort with wear. The leak guards are also of high quality and I was happy with the wicking ability through the core padding of this diaper. Also of note, I found the construction of this diaper to be interesting, with a thicker backsheet material running over the padding and up the front and back waistlines well above the wings, particularly at the rear.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 6

I feel the Duchesse Flexi Slip is likely better for dealing with bowel incontinence during daily wear than overnight wear because the rear waist has a substantial gap that would be problematic for night wear. On the plus side, this diaper has an extensive area of rear padding coverage and decent leak guards, but it also has a cloth-like/breathable design that won’t be the best for containing odors. This diaper certainly could be used for managing bowel incontinence, though there are far better options available in this regard, like the Forma-Care X-Plus.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Duchesse Flexi Slip features a cloth-like backsheet with a distinctive thicker midsection extending above the wings at the waist and at the rear; likely to provide better leak protection in comparison to the porous wings. The tapes are decent quality but use a 4 strip hook & loop combined with adhesive tape material to stay fastened. This means the tape part is susceptible to losing its stickiness with multiple re-attachments.

3.1 Duchesse Flexi Slip Fastener

Ease-of-Use Rating: 8

The Dutchesse Flexi Slip is comparable to the Tranquility Smartcore when it comes to ease-of-use. It’s quite easy to get a snug fit, though not quite perfect. With this being a “Medium/Large” sized, it’s safe to say the sizing runs rather small, comparable to the “Small/Medium” Depend Protection with Tabs. The tapes are generally easy to use and reapply and the wetness indicator clearly turns blue when wet without much fading. This diaper is very skin friendly given how breathable it is and it has decent inner leak guards and leg gathers. I feel it’d be a little better geared toward bedwetting and lower levels of activity. That said, I feel the looser fit around the rear and lack of waistbands would make this a challenge when dealing with heavy bowel incontinence. Overall, it’s well constructed and consistent in terms of quality so I think most will find it fits their needs.

3.2 Duchesse Flexi Slip Fit

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 10

The Duchesse Flexi Slip is about as comfortable as they come with regards to dry comfort. This diaper is highly breathable and made of soft flexible materials. The padding and tapes hold up very well with wear and I didn’t feel any clumping or tearing. All in all, the fit is quite snug and doesn’t loosen with wear. My only minor complaint would be that the rear of the diaper isn’t very snug and has a bit of a gap since it doesn’t have a waistband to hold it to the waist. That said, I didn’t feel like this took away from the dry comfort because it doesn’t cause the diaper to sag or fit awkwardly so I didn’t count it against it.


Comfort Rating (wet): 8

The Duchesse Flexi Slip proved quite comfortable when wet. It’s one of few diapers where I found that I’d wake up in the morning and be unsure of whether I’d wet the previous night without checking the wetness indicator. The diaper remains remarkably breathable when wet and I never found surface dampness to be much of an issue; it’s barely perceivable with just a single wetting. The padding of this diaper takes on a somewhat squishy texture when wet but not in the same way you’d get from others like the Rearz Barnyard/Elite Hybrid. It almost feels as if the dry padding just became thicker. If there is any downside I’d say it’s that I noticed some slight sagging when wet as well as a little pressout on the second wetting. Compared with the dry state the tapes just aren’t strong enough to keep the same snug fit.

3.3 Duchesse Flexi Slip Topsheet and Backsheet

Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 7.4% (topsheet), 5.7% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 3 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 7
The Duchesse Flexi Sip performed decently in the dry durability test. After extended wear there was relatively little padding deterioration though some of it did border into core padding. I didn’t consider it to be enough to considerably weaken its absorption ability, but it was still not quite up there with the top performers either. Otherwise, the tapes on this diaper generally held up while dry, but did become a bit loose over time. I didn’t find looseness of this diaper to be an issue during dry wear, at least not enough to significantly detract from its durability. Moreover, I didn’t notice much in the way of padding clumping. I feel with waistbands for a better fit this diaper would score a bit higher; as it is now it’s plenty durable for low activity but not quite for more active wear.


Durability Rating (wet): 7

The Duchesse Flexi Slip isn’t a top performer when it comes to wet durability but better than many cloth-backed diapers. I noticed some minor tearing/bunching of the padding and it came apart quickly in the shake test. However, I didn’t find the amount of padding deterioration significantly impacted its utility. The biggest weakness ended up being the weakening of the tapes under the weight of wet wear, though I also found some minor leaks that appeared to come out through the backsheet when seated after 2 wettings. I found that with extended wear while wet, the diaper had a loose feel and could have benefited from strong tapes/waistbands.

3.4 Duchesse Flexi Slip Dry Test Deterioration

Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 4 cm (1.6"), 5 cm (2")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 8 cm (1.6"), 5.5 cm (2.2")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 4 cm (3.2"), 3 cm (1.2")

Profile Discretion Rating: 8

The Duchesse Flexi Slip provides a similar level of profile discretion to the Medline Extended Wear. It has a relatively snug fit that holds up well with wear. The core padding sits mostly at the middle and rear so there’s a bit of a diaper bulge at the rear but it’s neglectable in the front. The thicker padding sits between the legs where it is less noticeable from a profile perspective. In terms of the diaper’s rise above the waistline it mostly shows up in the rear and I wouldn’t expect it to stand out much.

4.1 Duchesse Flexi Slip Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Duchesse Flexi Slip Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 


Noise

Noise Rating: 10

The Duchesse Flexi Slip gets top marks when it comes to noise discretion. It has a very soft cloth-like backsheet that doesn’t rustle or put up resistance. The noise produced by this diaper was almost indistinguishable during testing and I’m quite certain no one would hear it in an environment with any amount of background noise. Additionally, the noise discretion extends to when the diaper is wet as I never noticed any noise when tested while wet.

4.3 Duchesse Flexi Slip Noise Profile

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 7
I didn't noticed much in the way of odors from the Duchesse Flexi Slip during testing. Like many other European manufactured diapers, the padding of this diaper seems to have a built-in resistance to the formation of odors. The biggest problem this diaper faces when it comes to odor resistance is the relatively loose fit at the rear. This would be particularly problematic for those with bowel incontinence. Moreover, I also have some concerns with respect to micro-leaks through the backsheet.

Saturday, 24 June 2023

Cardinal Health Wings Plus (Heavy) Adult Diaper Review

*For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology. For a list of all product reviews see the Product Index.


 

Summary

The Cardinal Health Wings Plus Quilted Adult Briefs are a line of diapers with a cloth-like backsheet manufactured by Cardinal Health. They range from “heavy” to “overnight” absorbency but most places only sell the “heavy” line and that’s what will be covered in this review. One interesting aspect of this diaper is that they explicitly suggest a weight range in addition to waist-size for recommended usage with the small being 38.5 kg ~ 56.7 kg (85 ~125 lbs), the medium 56.7 kg ~ 79.4 kg (125 ~ 175 lbs) and so on, which is rather uncommon for adult diapers. The branding of this diaper is also somewhat confusing, probably due to rebranding over time. It has appeared as being manufactured by Covidien, which was previously Kendall and currently appears to be Medtronic, where it has been branded under the Cardinal Health name. Yet, there still seem to be plenty of old name references swinging around the web.

In terms of performance, you can’t expect much from the “heavy” line of this brand. It has a relatively low level of absorbency and will frequently leak with only a single wetting. Generally, I was only able to feel secure when testing this diaper in combination with a booster pad. Otherwise, it’s highly breathable and comfortable so maybe there is something to the “quilted” branding. It didn’t do as well when it came to durability, it’s very thin and lightweight. This has me interested in trying the “overnight” version, with the hopes that it could be a good cheaper option for moderate bedwetting.


Key Features:

  • Cloth-like backsheet
  • Repositionable tapes
  • Wetness indicator

Pros:

  • Highly breathable/comfortable
  • Tapes hold decently
  • Discreet

Cons:

  • Low absorbency
  • Padding is thin/breaks down easy
  • No standing inner leak guards

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the medium-sized Cardinal Health Wings Plus (Heavy absorbancy) Diaper. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Cardinal Health
Manufacturer: Cardinal Health 200, LLC
Origin: USA
Units Per Bag: 12
Cost Per Unit: $
Dimensions (L x W x H): 28 cm (11") x 19 cm (7.5") x 15 cm (5.9")
Weight: 0.93 kg (2.0 lbs)
Available Sizes: S,M, L,XL
Advertised Absorbency: Heavy

1.1 Wings Plus Packaging

Diaper

Backsheet: Cloth-like (non-woven)
Wetness Indicator: Yes (yellow line down middle, blue when wet)
Standing Inner Leak Guards: No
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Tab-Style Brief
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 2
Repositionable Tabs: Yes
Outer Color: White
Inner Color: White (light blue rectangle in middle)
Front Waistband: No
Rear Waistband: No
Folded Thickness: 2 cm (0.79")
Folded Length: 19 cm (7.5")
Dry Weight: 83 g (2.9 oz)
Fragrance: No
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 80 cm (31.5") x 63 cm (24.8") x 27 cm (10.6") x 60 cm (23.6")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 64 cm (25.2") x 24 cm (9.45") x 15 cm (5.9") x 24 cm (9.5")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 4.5 cm (1.8") x 15 cm (5.9") x 4.5 cm (1.8") x 19 cm (7.5")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Semicircle, Rectangular
Total Padding Area: 1266 cm2 (196 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1 x t2): 3 cm (1.2") x 14 cm (5.5")
Tape (W x L): 3 cm (1.2") x 4.5 cm (1.8")

1.2 Wings Plus Diaper


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 667 ml (23.5 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 692 ml (24.4 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (49 s, 56 s, 67 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 4 cm (1.6")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 91%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 0.53 ml / cm2 (0.12 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 25 ml (0.88 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 5

I rank the Wings Plus diaper similar to the FitRight Ultra when it comes to surface dampness. It’s far from the best on the market, with dampness even showing up after the first wetting. That said, for its expected use of maybe one wetting I didn’t find it terrible. The breathability goes a long way to reducing the impact of surface dampness (if it weren’t for that I’d rank it much lower) but the limited absorption means it doesn’t take much for pooling to occur during a wetting.


2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test

"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 542 ml (19.1 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing)
Leaked After Sitting: Yes
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 93%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.43 ml / cm2 (0.10 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 4
The Wings Plus diaper performed poorly on the standing-sitting test, with a significant leak up on sitting after a wetting. The first wetting while standing was fully absorbed without leaks but the padding did sag a bit and felt quite saturated. Upon sitting shortly afterward there was a substantial leak through the leg gathers so I called the test at that. At this point most of the padding was saturated and there clearly wasn’t much room for additional absorbance. I wouldn’t recommend this diaper for anything more than light-moderate incontinence during daily usage. If the padding is damp it’s very likely to leak upon sitting.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 717 ml (25.3 oz)
Total Wettings: 2
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 98%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.57 ml / cm2 (0.13 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 4

The Wings Plus performed a bit better than expected when tested while lying down. My expectations were low and I figured it would leak on the first wetting. Surprisingly the first wetting was completely absorbed with only a bit of brief pooling and there was still dry padding up the front of the diaper. I did notice a very small leak after a while, but not so much that I decided to stop the test. On the second wetting it felt like very little was absorbed and there was substantial pooling with nearly all of it leaking out through the backsheet. The diaper is pretty breathable so it wasn’t even immediately obvious how much leaked until I got up to check. I generally would advise against using this diaper for bedwetting, particularly if you’re a heavy wetter. I would expect it to leak on the first wetting at least some of the time and it doesn’t have inner leak guards so wetting from different positions could be problematic.

2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

The Wings Plus diaper sits in an interesting category. Being a diaper rather than protective underwear it has the convenience of easy changes with tabs, which could be a plus for those who don’t need full absorbency. But otherwise, I feel many active individuals looking for an incontinence product with this level of absorbance would opt for protective underwear instead. It doesn’t seem built to take a full wetting without leaking, whether during daily or overnight wear. With that in mind, in addition to testing it standalone I also used it with the relatively small/cheap attends booster pads and didn’t experience many leaks after a single wetting when the two were combined. However, whether the tradeoff of using a booster pad and diaper combo is more economical than the unit price of a more absorbent diaper is certainly questionable and likely not worth it in this case. I found the tabs on this diaper to be decent and I wish this tab style was used for some of the other more absorbent cloth-like diapers as it works better than the lines of hook & loop combined with glue-based tape adhesive. During active wear the padding on this diaper readily came apart so I doubt it would be good for activities even if the absorbance were sufficient. Likely it will be useful for those with light-moderate incontinence who are less active or more likely in care settings where diaper changes hopefully happen more frequently. I suppose it could also be used for bouts of frequent lighter bowel incontinence due to gastrointestinal distress, since you’d likely be changing frequently and may not notice the other deficiencies. I’d be curious to try the higher absorbency versions of this diaper since I did find it to be surprisingly comfortable and feel it has some potential to be a decent cheaper diaper for bedwetting. Unfortunately, the more absorbent versions like the overnight version are less widely available.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 2

Without standing inner leak guards or waistbands the Wings Plus diaper doesn’t check many boxes with respect to containing bowel incontinence. Moreover, I wouldn’t expect the cloth-like backsheet to do much to prevent odors and the padding in the rear is rather thin. For all of these reasons I wouldn’t recommend the Wings Plus diaper for those with bowel incontinence.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Wings Plus features a cloth-like backsheet with a somewhat loose fit and hook & loop fasteners. The fasteners can be repositioned multiple times on different parts of the backsheet so it’s easy to re-attach as necessary. The tapes are primarily made of hook & loop fastener material so don’t lose adhesiveness with refastenings but the backsheet does wear a bit and can make it harder to retain the fit.

3.1 Wings Plus Fastener
 

Ease-of-Use Rating: 7

I found the Wings Plus to be fairly user friendly in that it’s easy to get a snug fit and tapes have sufficient grip without being difficult to apply or remove. It comes with a wetness indicator that’s yellow and turns blue when wet, though I’ve found it often even fads right out. The lack of standing inner leak guards poses more of an issue and will clearly be a challenge for those with bowel incontinence. In terms of fit, I found the sizing to be a bit smaller than you might otherwise expect for the suggested waist measurements. Generally, I was happy with how well this diaper held up during wear in terms of fit, but the padding was less fortunate and more susceptible to deterioration even if the diaper was able to resist loosening. Moreover, it’s highly likely to leak after a single wetting, limiting its potential utility if not worn with a booster pad.

3.2 Wings Plus Fit

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 8

The Wings Plus diaper has a soft airy feel to it. I’d even go so far to say it feels more breathable than most regular underwear much like Attento Tape Diaper. The main downside to this diaper when it comes to comfort is its durability, as the backsheet readily detaches from the padding and the padding is prone to tearing. However, in its dry state it's light enough to keep relatively intact and I wouldn’t say this is too much of a detraction. Otherwise, the tapes are decent and it doesn’t come loose as easily as many other cloth-backed diapers, even if not as snug as the best in the market.


Comfort Rating (wet): 6

The Wings Plus diaper is reasonably comfortable when wet, mostly on account of having such a breathable design. This helps alleviate what would otherwise feel quite clammy. The tapes also hold surprisingly well, if still far from the best on the market. That said, it has a low absorbency and the padding will reach saturation and leak quickly. During testing this was apparent in surface dampness. That, combined with the tendency for the padding to break apart significantly detracts from the comfort, so I couldn’t give it as high a rating as I might otherwise.

3.3 Wings Plus Topsheet and Backsheet

Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 21% (topsheet), 27.4% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 2 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 5
I rank the Wings Plus diaper slightly below the FitRight Restore when it comes to dry durability. The padding in this diaper feels thinner and, consequently, more prone to tearing with occasional clumping. Moreover, the padding in this diaper readily detached from the backsheet, giving it a papery feel. That said, I do feel that the tapes on this diaper are a little better than the FitRight Restore, but not enough to overcome the issues with the padding. These tapes rely mostly on hook & loop fastener material rather than a tape adhesive, thus they can be refastened multiple times without losing their strength (albeit there’s no landing zone so if you tear enough of the backsheet that could be a problem). I did find that sometimes the lower tapes won’t hold as snugly as I would like and even though the tapes are good it can still feel loose with active wear.


Durability Rating (wet): 5

The Wings Plus wet durability isn’t much different from its dry durability. The padding is thin and equally likely to clump or tear when wet if not slightly more so due to the added weight. I still found it to be more durable than the worst performers like the Attends Care Poly or Healthy Spirit diapers but far from what you’d expect in any of the premium or even mid-range diapers. It’s likely best suited for care facilities that can make frequent changes with inactive individuals. Due to its limited absorbency you’ll probably find durability is less an issue compared with needing to change before leaks.

3.4 Wings Plus Dry Test Deterioration

Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 4 cm (1.6")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 6 cm (2.4"), 5 cm (2")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 3.5 cm (1.4"), 3 cm (1.2")

Profile Discretion Rating: 8

I score the Wings Plus diaper highly when it comes to profile discretion. It’s very thin and easy to hide under clothing, albeit the lack of absorbency could challenge that when wet. It does rise a bit above the waistline, but has a thin white fabric look to it and I wouldn’t consider that to be particularly noticeable if someone were to catch a glimpse. I rank it similar to the Tranquility Smartcore in this regard.

 

4.1 Wings Plus Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Wings Plus Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 


Noise

Noise Rating: 8

The Wings Plus diaper is among the quieter diapers on the market, even though it has some key issues that typically cause a lot of noise in other products. The primary problem being the backsheet separating from the padding. However, because the backsheet is a soft cloth-like material it doesn’t make much noise as it folds. The other potential source of noise is the hook & loop fasteners which can make a little noise as they shift. All in all you’re unlikely to have any issues with noise when wearing this diaper but for the level of absorbency there are quieter options available.

4.3 Wings Plus Noise Profile

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 7
The snug fit provided by the Wings Plus seems to do a decent job at resisting odors. I also got the sense that the padding had some degree of odor resistance built in. During testing I never noticed much, but with the key caveat that this diaper can’t be used beyond a single wetting. Additionally, it being cloth-backed and breathable would be an issue were any odors to form.


Want to give the Wings Plus (Heavy) a try?

Help us continue to produce quality reviews by making a purchase through our Wings Plus affiliate link. With every purchase this blog will earn a small amount of commission at no extra cost to the purchaser.