Summary
Amazon Germany Review Suggestions Wish List
Amazon France Review Suggestions Wish List
Absorbency Ranking
Diaper | Scoring |
---|---|
Score: 9.47 Absorbency: 2158 ml (76.1 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.14 ml/cm2 (0.26 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 9 Lying Down Score: 10 Used Percent: 80 |
|
Score: 9.45 Absorbency: 2075 ml (73.2 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.07 ml/cm2 (0.24 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 10 Lying Down Score: 10 Used Percent: 79 |
|
Score: 9.42 Absorbency: 1895 ml (66.8 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.17 ml/cm2 (0.27 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 10 Lying Down Score: 10 Used Percent: 93 |
|
Score: 9.36 Absorbency: 2158 ml (76.1 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.17 ml/cm2 (0.27 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 9 Lying Down Score: 10 Used Percent: 72 |
|
Score: 9.27 Absorbency: 1891 ml (66.7 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.19 ml/cm2 (0.27 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 9 Lying Down Score: 10 Used Percent: 82 |
|
Score: 8.82 Absorbency: 1834 ml (42.6 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.14 ml/cm2 (0.26 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 9 Lying Down Score: 9 Used Percent: 76 |
|
Score: 8.66 Absorbency: 1492 ml (52.6 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.33 ml/cm2 (0.30 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 8 Lying Down Score: 9 Used Percent: 93 |
|
Score: 8.44 Absorbency: 1475 ml (52.0 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.08 ml/cm2 (0.25 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 9 Lying Down Score: 9 Used Percent: 96 |
|
Score: 8.26 Absorbency: 1449 ml (52.1 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 1.01 ml/cm2 (0.23 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 8 Lying Down Score: 8 Used Percent: 86 |
|
Score: 8.24 Absorbency: 1601 ml (56.5 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 0.88 ml/cm2 (0.20 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 8 Lying Down Score: 10 Used Percent: 88 |
|
Score: 8.17 Absorbency: 1775 ml (62.6 oz) Absorbency Ratio: 0.89 ml/cm2 (0.20 oz/in2) Leg Gathers: yes Inner Leak Guards: yes Stand/Sit Score: 8 Lying Down Score: 9 Used Percent: 79 |
Comfort Ranking
Diaper | Scoring |
---|---|
Score: 9.31 Padding Area: 1435 cm2 (222 in2) Absorbency Time: 42 s Dry Comfort Score: 10 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 9 Ease of Use Score: 10 |
|
Score: 9.03 Padding Area: 1625 cm2 (252 in2) Absorbency Time: 58 s Dry Comfort Score: 9 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 10 Ease of Use Score: 10 |
|
Score: 9.01 Padding Area: 1584 cm2 (245 in2) Absorbency Time: 77 s Dry Comfort Score: 10 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 9 Ease of Use Score: 10 |
|
Score: 8.89 Padding Area: 1823 cm2 (282 in2) Absorbency Time: 56 s Dry Comfort Score: 9 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 9 Ease of Use Score: 8 |
|
Score: 8.88 Padding Area: 1187 cm2 (184 in2) Absorbency Time: 76 s Dry Comfort Score: 10 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 8 Ease of Use Score: 6 |
|
Score: 8.77 Padding Area: 1120 cm2 (174 in2) Absorbency Time: 48 s Dry Comfort Score: 10 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 8 Ease of Use Score: 7 |
|
Score: 8.72 Padding Area: 1823 cm2 (283 in2) Absorbency Time: 97 s Dry Comfort Score: 9 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 9 Ease of Use Score: 10 |
|
Score: 8.63 Padding Area: 1611 cm2 (250 in2) Absorbency Time: 85 s Dry Comfort Score: 9 Wet Comfort Score: 10 Surface Dampness Score: 9 Ease of Use Score: 9 |
|
Score: 8.59 Padding Area: 1840 cm2 (285 in2) Absorbency Time: 41 s Dry Comfort Score: 10 Wet Comfort Score: 8 Surface Dampness Score: 7 Ease of Use Score: 7 |
|
Score: 8.51 Padding Area: 1091 cm2 (169 in2) Absorbency Time: 45 s Dry Comfort Score: 10 Wet Comfort Score: 9 Surface Dampness Score: 8 Ease of Use Score: 7 |
|
Score: 8.43 Padding Area: 1594 cm2 (247 in2) Absorbency Time: 46 s Dry Comfort Score: 9 Wet Comfort Score: 9 Surface Dampness Score: 8 Ease of Use Score: 7 |
Durability Ranking
In this year's durability ranking we've reused the adjusted formula from the 2021 durability rankings. This formula accounts for how much padding is destroyed after extended wear/tear, how well the tapes hold up and whether the padding is prone to clumps or tears. Unlike in other categories, none of the top 5 most durable diapers from previous years were replaced by diapers reviewed in the past year. The ABU Little Kings and Trest Elite Briefs made an appearance in this year's ranking, bumping out the Attends Slip Regular Plus 10M.
Diaper | Scoring |
---|---|
Score: 9.44 Tape Area: 45 cm2 (7.0 in2) Dry Durability Score: 10 Wet Durability Score: 10 Shake Test: 12 Topsheet Deterioration: 0.55% Backsheet Deterioration: 1.38% Waistband: rear |
|
Score: 9.25 Tape Area: 60 cm2 (9.3 in2) Dry Durability Score: 10 Wet Durability Score: 10 Shake Test: 4 Topsheet Deterioration: 0.58% Backsheet Deterioration: 2.61% Waistband: front/rear |
|
Score: 8.96 Tape Area: 40 cm2 (6.2 in2) Dry Durability Score: 10 Wet Durability Score: 10 Shake Test: 3 Topsheet Deterioration: 0.53% Backsheet Deterioration: 1.09% Waistband: rear |
|
Score: 8.89 Tape Area: 45 cm2 (7 in2) Dry Durability Score: 10 Wet Durability Score: 10 Shake Test: 7 Topsheet Deterioration: 0.54% Backsheet Deterioration: 0.56% Waistband: none |
|
Score: 8.80 Tape Area: 69 cm2 (10.7 in2) Dry Durability Score: 9 Wet Durability Score: 9 Shake Test: 4 Topsheet Deterioration: 1.22% Backsheet Deterioration: 1.78% Waistband: front/rear |
|
Score: 8.79 Tape Area: 80 cm2 (12.4 in2) Dry Durability Score: 9 Wet Durability Score: 10 Shake Test: 2 Topsheet Deterioration: 8.45% Backsheet Deterioration: 7.14% Waistband: front/rear |
|
Score: 8.77 Tape Area: 72 cm2 (10.7 in2) Dry Durability Score: 9 Wet Durability Score: 9 Shake Test: 4 Topsheet Deterioration: 4.13% Backsheet Deterioration: 1.61% Waistband: front/rear |
|
Score: 8.72 Tape Area: 90 cm2 (14 in2) Dry Durability Score: 9 Wet Durability Score: 9 Shake Test: 3 Topsheet Deterioration: 4.70% Backsheet Deterioration: 6.44% Waistband: front/rear |
|
Score: 8.57 Tape Area: 40 cm2 (6.2 in2) Dry Durability Score: 9 Wet Durability Score: 9 Shake Test: 5 Topsheet Deterioration: 6.16% Backsheet Deterioration: 6.56% Waistband: front/rear |
|
Score: 8.50 Tape Area: 64 cm2 (9.9 in2) Dry Durability Score: 9 Wet Durability Score: 9 Shake Test: 2 Topsheet Deterioration: 7.79% Backsheet Deterioration: 4.69% Waistband: front/rear |
|
Score: 8.46 Tape Area: 45 cm2 (7 in2) Dry Durability Score: 9 Wet Durability Score: 9 Shake Test: 2 Topsheet Deterioration: 5.63% Backsheet Deterioration: 3.25% Waistband: front/rear |
Discretion Ranking
Diaper | Scoring |
---|---|
Score: 7.84 Profile Discretion Score: 9 Noise Score: 10 Odor Reduction Score: 7 Dry Weight: 112 g (4 oz) Folded Length: 21 cm (8.3") Wet Folded Thickness: 4.5 cm (1.8") Average Rise Above Waist: 0.33 cm (0.13") Dry Folded Thickness: 1.8 cm (0.7") |
|
Score: 7.59 Profile Discretion Score: 9 Noise Score: 9 Odor Reduction Score: 10 Dry Weight: 125 g (4.4 oz) Folded Length: 25 cm (9.8") Wet Folded Thickness: 5 cm (2") Average Rise Above Waist: 4.4 cm (1.7") Dry Folded Thickness: 2 cm (0.8") |
|
Score: 7.42 Profile Discretion Score: 8 Noise Score: 10 Odor Reduction Score: 9 Dry Weight: 116 g (4.1 oz) Folded Length: 24 cm (9.5") Wet Folded Thickness: 4.5 cm (1.8") Average Rise Above Waist: 5.1 cm (2") Dry Folded Thickness: 2 cm (0.8") |
|
Score: 7.38 Profile Discretion Score: 7 Noise Score: 10 Odor Reduction Score: 10 Dry Weight: 142 g (5 oz) Folded Length: 24 cm (9.5") Wet Folded Thickness: 5 cm (2") Average Rise Above Waist: 4.5 cm (1.8") Dry Folded Thickness: 1.8 cm (0.7") |
|
Score: 7.30 Profile Discretion Score: 9 Noise Score: 9 Odor Reduction Score: 10 Dry Weight: 108 g (3.8 oz) Folded Length: 26 cm (10.2") Wet Folded Thickness: 3 cm (1.18") Average Rise Above Waist: 5.3 cm (2.1") Dry Folded Thickness: 2 cm (0.8") |
|
Score: 7.25 Profile Discretion Score: 8 Noise Score: 10 Odor Reduction Score: 7 Dry Weight: 100 g (3.5 oz) Folded Length: 21.5 cm (8.5") Wet Folded Thickness: 5 cm (2") Average Rise Above Waist: 3.6 cm (1.4") Dry Folded Thickness: 1.5 cm (0.6") |
|
Score: 7.22 Profile Discretion Score: 8 Noise Score: 9 Odor Reduction Score: 9 Dry Weight: 100 g (3.5 oz) Folded Length: 21 cm (8.3") Wet Folded Thickness: 5 cm (2") Average Rise Above Waist: 5.8 cm (2.3") Dry Folded Thickness: 2.5 cm (1") |
|
Score: 7.22 Profile Discretion Score: 7 Noise Score: 10 Odor Reduction Score: 10 Dry Weight: 158 g (5.6 oz) Folded Length: 25 cm (9.8") Wet Folded Thickness: 5 cm (2") Average Rise Above Waist: 3.8 cm (1.5") Dry Folded Thickness: 2.7 cm (1.06") |
|
Score: 7.20 Profile Discretion Score: 9 Noise Score: 9 Odor Reduction Score: 8 Dry Weight: 117 g (4.13 oz) Folded Length: 23 cm (9.1") Wet Folded Thickness: 4.5 cm (1.8") Average Rise Above Waist: 5.2 cm (2") Dry Folded Thickness: 2.3 cm (0.9") |
|
Score: 7.11 Profile Discretion Score: 8 Noise Score: 10 Odor Reduction Score: 7 Dry Weight: 100 g (3.5 oz) Folded Length: 21 cm (8.3") Wet Folded Thickness: 4 cm (1.6") Average Rise Above Waist: 4.9 cm (1.9") Dry Folded Thickness: 2.5 cm (1") |
Overall Top 10 Ranking
Diaper | Scoring |
---|---|
Score: 8.56 The Seni Super Quatro once again came in at the top spot. This diaper may not be the most absorbent, but when comfort, durability and discretion are factored in this one is hard to beat overall. It's cloth-backed, but it's well worth a try if you're willing to give it a chance. Product consistency appears to be very good in the Seni lineup, more so than many others on the market. |
|
Score: 8.53 The BetterDry/Crinklz diaper retained it's spot at second place. When tested in 2020 this diaper proved exceptionally absorbent but also comfortable and somewhat discreet for a diaper of its absorbency. I've had mixed feedback on more recent versions of this diaper, but generally its still viewed positively. More recently it's been more difficult to purchase these in certain locales, so hopefully any supply chain issues will be resolved soon. |
|
Score: 8.32 The ABU Little Kings was the top addition to this list from the 2023 reviews. This diaper is clearly geared toward the ABDL market, but is a high quality cloth-backed diaper with a wide tape landing zone, very high absorbency and detailed designs. This is really a premium diaper in every sense and impractical for regular use given its very high unit price, but if you're looking for something playful this diaper certainly fits the bill. |
|
Score: 8.32 The Tena Slip Ultima is a more absorbent version of the popular Tena Slip Maxi. It features the same smooth-comfortable plastic-backsheet and a surprisingly discreet design. As far as plastic-backed diapers, it may well be the most comfortable on the market. There are very few trade-offs in this diaper and it would be perfectly fine for a day out. |
|
Score: 8.28 The Trest Elite Briefs are another new addition to this list. These diapers advertise a ridiculous level of absorbency. In reality you'll get far less than advertised but still enough to put them among the most absorbent diapers on the market. These diapers are very thick but quite comfortable and feature a plastic backsheet with a tape landing zone. | |
Score: 8.00 The ConfiDry 24/7 appears to be a case of the right diaper, but wrong management. It was easily the best North American diaper when it was actually being produced. Sadly, it appears production and distribution efforts failed and its no longer being produced. |
|
Score: 7.89 The NorthShore Supreme diaper continued to maintain a top 10 position in this years rankings. It's similar to the Drylife SlipSuper or iD Slip Maxi (PE) but with a bit more absorbency. This diaper proved highly durable and comfortable. Some have found its padding to be a bit firm but it makes up for it in other aspects. It also runs more compact in sizing like many premium European diapers. |
|
Score: 7.89 The Molicare Premium Elastic Briefs was the only affordable diaper to enter the top 10 list this year. It's not the top in any particular category, but overall showed strong performance. I should note that the small and medium sizes have substantial differences and this is based specifically on the small size. This diaper has a snug breathable fit and provides a great degree of discretion. |
|
Score: 7.86 The Drylife SlipSuper is a great all around diaper and surprisingly affordable when it's available. Its padding is a little on the stiff side, though it softens when wet. This diaper is a tank when it comes to durability and held its own in terms of absorbency. |
|
Score: 7.66 The Attends Slip Regular Plus continues to keep its spot as the top Attends diaper on the market. It's comparable to the Tena Slip line of products. It's backed with a very smooth/comfortable plastic and provides a great combination of durability and discretion. It feels well suited to active wear and where it can be found the pricing seems reasonable. |
|
Score: 7.65 The Forma-Care X-Plus has continued to round the top 10 overall rankings after entering the previous year. This diaper has a distinctive blue backsheet with a soft, comfortable padding. This diaper is plastic-backed but quite good at heat distribution and the plastic is smooth, similar to the Tena Slip products. |
Diaper Rankings Spreadsheet
Over the past few years I've received lots of requests for making the data collected from these reviews more accessible. To make it easier to analyze the rankings in their entirety I've created a publicly accessible spreadsheet with key metrics for comparison. The diaper names in the right column all link to their respective reviews and you can use a predefined "Filter View" to sort it by the category you're most interested in (see the image below). I'll only note that the current "Diaper Area" metric is currently missing some data from the wings so I've highlighted it in red. This will be corrected when I have time to go back and capture the necessary metrics.
2023 Adult Diaper Rankings Spreadsheet