Friday, 22 November 2024

Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diapers Review

 *For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology


 

Summary

The Attends Slip Classic 10 is a “hybrid” style diaper with a plastic backsheet and cloth-like wings that sits at the top of European Attends absorbency range (10 drops). Interestingly, it shares its absorbency rating with several other products, including the Attends Slip Active, Attends Flex and Attends Slip Regular (which I believe to be similar to, and likely absorbent than, the discontinued Attends Slip Regular Plus). However, the “Classic” line only comes in a single level of absorbency unlike the other products at this range. The “hybrid” design is similar to the Attends Slip Active but this diaper has two tapes per side vs the single tape per side on the Active version. This diaper has a fit that’s more on the large size and sizing starts at medium rather than small, similar to the Attends Slip Active. Its design resembles the Tena Slip Maxi Original and it’s odd that “Classic” and “Original” terminology was used in each case for this design since it appears to be newer than the completely plastic-backed versions.

In terms of performance, I found this diaper was good for at least one wetting and many will likely find it can even manage two wettings without leakage. The averaged overall absorbency was consistent with what I’ve found in many of the premium diapers on the market at over 1000 ml (33.8 oz). For me it performed worse at night, but that may be because the loose fit contributed more to gaps in the leak barriers when lying down. Getting a snug fit is the tricky part. Even though it has a rear waistband I found the overall fit tended to be loose and even when I made the tapes tight I always felt like the fit became a bit looser over time. It uses a double fastening tape mechanism and they can be refastened multiple times, but you’ll need to use some care with it because I found they can lose a bit of their adhesiveness. Also, they won’t adhere to cloth-like wings and doing so could weaken them further; so there’s an upper limit to the sizing here as well. I’d like to give a special thanks again to Denis for his donation that contributed to this review! It was an interesting product to test and the unique hybrid backsheet design/high absorbency makes it a standout product.


Key Features:

  • Plastic backsheet
  • Cloth-like wings
  • Standing inner leak guards
  • Wetness indicator
  • Refastenable fasteners
  • Rear waistband

Pros:

  • Highly absorbent
  • Comfortable/breathable sides
  • Strong resistance to surface dampness

Cons:

  • Limited sizing
  • Tape weakness

 

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the large-sized Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diaper. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Attends
Manufacturer: Attends Healthcare AB
Origin: EU
Units Per Bag: 15
Cost Per Unit: $
Dimensions (L x W x H): 35 cm (13.8") x 15 cm (5.9") x 25 cm (9.8")
Weight: 2.08 kg (4.6 lbs)
Available Sizes: M,L,XL
Advertised Absorbency: Heavy

1.1 Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diaper Packaging

Diaper

Backsheet: Plastic (poly)
Wetness Indicator: Yes (two yellow lines down middle, blue/faded when wet)
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Tab-Style Brief
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 2
Repositionable Tabs: No
Outer Color: White (blue Attends logos down middle)
Inner Color: White
Front Waistband: No
Rear Waistband: Yes
Folded Thickness: 2.66 cm (1.05")
Folded Length: 24.5 cm (9.7")
Dry Weight: 137 g (4.8 oz)
Fragrance: No
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 78 cm (30.7") x 68 cm (26.8") x 31 cm (12.2") x 65 cm (25.6")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 63 cm (24.8") x 23.5 cm (9.3") x 15 cm (5.9") x 24 cm (9.5")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 4.3 cm (1.7") x 12 cm (4.7") x 4.5 cm (1.8") x 12 cm (4.7")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Semicircle, Semicircle
Total Padding Area: 1155 cm2 (179 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1 x t2): 2.5 cm (1") x 15 cm (5.9")
Tape (W x L): 2.5 cm (1") x 4 cm (1.6")

 

1.2 Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diaper


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 1183 ml (41.7 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 1188 ml (41.9 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (38 s, 37 s, 40 s, 40 s, 42 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 5.5 cm (2.2")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 80%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 1.02 ml / cm2 (0.23 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 5 ml (0.18 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 8

The Attends Slip Classic performed strongly with respect to resistance to surface dampness. There was no sign of dampness on the paper towel test after the first wetting and only a small amount after the second. Subsequent wettings showed a bit of pressout but nothing like what I saw on the first from some of the lower performers in this category. This was confirmed during real world testing, where I barely noticed dampness or pressout; of course, it was also assisted by the very breathable design.


2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test

"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 1338 ml (47.2 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing, 2 sitting)
Leaked After Sitting: No
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 83%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 1.16 ml / cm2 (0.26 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 8
The Attends Slip Classic proved quite effective when tested while standing and sitting. The first wetting while standing was quickly absorbed with only very temporary pooling in the mid section. The pooling was distributed through the padding within seconds. The front and rear of the diaper’s padding remained dry as the dampness was concentrated in the mid padding. The padding swelled considerably and felt firmer when wet. There was no sign of leakage upon sitting and the diaper didn’t feel damp or uncomfortable, demonstrating its breathability. On the second wetting while seated moisture quickly pooled up into the previously dry front padding with a longer period of pooling than the first wetting. Nothing made it through into the sides and it was effectively absorbed by the remaining area of dry padding without any sign of leaks. Even at this point it felt surprisingly comfortable with the dampness only slightly more noticeable near the leak barriers where the padding was thinner. Eventually some moisture did seem to make it to the rear padding, though there was no leakage and still some dry padding at the rear while the front was clearly at or near capacity. The third wetting was definitely going to leak given the condition of the front padding. Initially there was considerable pooling and the padding swelled significantly. Soon after, moisture made it into the wings and leaked out through the sides. Surprisingly there was still a considerable amount of dry padding at the rear, but there was no way the moisture could have channeled that far before leaking. Based on these results I feel the Attends Slip Classic will probably handle up to 2 wettings without leaks, but I wouldn’t push it past that.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 888 ml (31.3 oz)
Total Wettings: 2
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 79%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.77 ml / cm2 (0.17 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 7

The Attends Slip Classic demonstrated strong performance when tested while lying down. The first wetting was easily absorbed, though with some temporary pooling. With the relatively loose fit, the moisture primarily ended up in the mid-section and the front and rear padding remained dry. After it was fully absorbed, I found the diaper to be comfortable and surface dampness wasn’t too apparent. On the second wetting, there was again significant initial pooling in the mid-section even though the front and rear padding remained dry. It ended up with a small leak through the right rear leak guard. It wasn’t a lot, but enough to leave a clear mark so I ended the test at that. Even so, once the remaining moisture had wicked through the padding it didn’t feel particularly damp, just a bit more than after the first wetting. The padding had clearly swollen and become a bit firmer. There was a substantial area of dry padding at the front and rear of the diaper as the looser fit meant less of it made it to those areas before leaking. I suspect had I managed a snugger fit it could have avoided the leak on the second wetting, though it surely would have leaked on the third wetting. I feel this diaper could comfortably be used for bedwetting and will absorb up to 2 wettings without leakage.


2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

The Attends Slip Classic can be considered one of the premium European diapers. While not quite at the level of the Tena Slip Ultima or perhaps even the Molicare Slip Maxi, this diaper still comes with many of the great features you’d look for in such diapers. The backsheet is a smooth, soft and comfortable plastic and the padding is dense but still relatively soft and highly absorbent. The breathable wings are a rare feature that make it a hybrid in not having an all plastic or all cloth-like backsheet, much like the Tena Slip Original Maxi or Attends Slip Active. One interesting aspect I found, which I’m not sure if it has a purpose or is just a side-effect of the manufacturing, was that the diaper has small indentations running parallel to the length of the padding when just removed from the bag. The indentations are only visible on the backsheet and I didn’t notice them in the padding topsheet, so they don’t appear to be moisture channels. Another thing I noticed with this diaper was that the structure and width of the padding created various spacious gaps and I often found large parts of my skin weren’t directly in contact with the padding during the wear. This was particularly the case when standing or lying down. It would certainly be good for containment, though also presents a risk of leakage because it can create gaps in the leg barriers. In fact, I found the fit to generally be larger than I would typically expect for a medium, so if you’re at or below the bottom end of its waist-range then it’s likely to fit too large for you. However, the tapes won’t attach to cloth-like wings so if you’re a bit too large then you might not get a great fit either. I feel like this diaper is best for someone right in the middle 60% of the waist range, given its sizing. All that said, the combination of its spacious fit and breathable sides made this perhaps one of the most skin friendly diapers I’ve tested. I never had any hint of skin irritation testing the Attends Slip Classic and it was nearly as comfortable in its wet state as its dry state. The material is also quite resistant to chafing so I never had issues with that, but the tape weakness limited how much activity I could do during wear. In terms of performance I found the Attends Slip Classic could consistently absorb one wetting without any worry about leaks and quite likely will absorb 2 wettings. With the relatively loose fit on me, I found it performed better during daily wear whereas when lying down it was more likely to allow for leak barrier gaps. I suspect for someone with a snugger fit you could probably consistently manage 2 wettings when worn overnight. My biggest complaint with this diaper would be its tapes, which I found to have a tendency to come loose or slide. I feel that adding stronger tapes would go a long way to improving the performance of this diaper. That said, if you don’t need it for active wear and have a preference for cloth-like sides for extra breathability, but want the comfort and protection of a plastic-backsheet, then this will be a great choice.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 7

The Attends Slip Classic is reasonably well suited for managing bowel incontinence; certainly a lot better than the Attends Slip Active. It has a generous pocket of space with extensive rear padding and a plastic backsheet over the core padding. The rear waistband is also a plus. However, the breathable sides will hinder odor management and the tape weakness could have a negative impact on bowel containment.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Attends Slip Classic has a hybrid design with a plastic backsheet over absorbent padding that runs down the center and cloth-like wings. The advantage of this design is that you get the leak-proof security of the plastic-backsheet with the breathability of the cloth-like sides. The fasteners use a double-tape mechanism where the blue bottom tape can be applied to the backsheet once then the white top tape can be refastened in the same position multiple times. It’s important to note that the fasteners can only be applied on the plastic part of the backsheet and won’t connect properly with the cloth-like material so if the diaper is sized too small it may not work for you. However, the sizing of this diaper runs large with the medium starting at an 80 cm (31.4”) waist and in my case where I regularly fit small/medium I felt it was a bit too large to get a snug fit.

3.1 Attends Slip Classic 10 Fastener

Ease-of-Use Rating: 8

The Attends Slip Classic is generally pretty easy to use. I found it a bit challenging to get a snug fit but I believe that’s because I sit right at the bottom of the recommended sizing for this diaper. That said, the primary issue one will run into is that the tapes can slide or lose adhesiveness with wear. Otherwise, I didn’t find positioning the tapes to be too much of a challenge and they’re pretty easy to reapply as needed. The wetness indicator will be good for those in a care environment, though it should be noted that I found it would turn blue due to moisture from sweat/dribbles before it was wet and actually needed a change. This diaper is nearly full featured and has a generous rear waistband/padding to help with containment. All in all, it’s pretty similar to the Attends Slip Active in terms of ease of use even though they have slightly different designs and the top tapes on this may work better for more body types.

3.2 Attends Slip Classic 10 Fit

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 8

The Attends Slip Classic is highly comfortable, probably more so than you’d typically expect for a plastic-backed diaper. Its “hybrid” design means it has a high resistance to heat-build up as any heat that starts to build is easily advected through the sides. I never felt so much as a hint of clamminess when wearing it. The padding is thick and dense, not the softest on the market, but still quite comfortable. Moreover, the padding is highly resistant to clumping or tearing and holds up very well with wear. It has a very spacious design so skin contact with padding is somewhat minimized anyway. With that in mind, this isn’t a snug fitting diaper, which may detract from the comfort for some. The primary issue I had with the Attends Slip Classic was the tendency for the tapes to shift or loosen. I felt after an extended period of wear that it was much looser than I’d initially set it.


Comfort Rating (wet): 8

I found the Attends Slip Classic to be highly comfortable in its wet state. In fact I could hardly tell it was wet after a single wetting other than the padding feeling a bit denser/swelling. Surface dampness was hardly noticeable and it continued to feel highly breathable when wet. The primary issue I found was that it had a tendency for sagging. I’m sure a part of this was due to the loose fit, but it also seems that either the tapes slid a bit or the sides stretched slightly to make it more obvious since it did feel looser when it was wet than in its dry state. If not for that I’d easily rank this diaper among the best on the market for wet comfort because the padding and design are perfectly suited for minimizing the impact of dampness.

3.3 Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diapers Topsheet and Backsheet

Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 7.1% (topsheet), 6.6% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 5 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 7
If the durability rating were on padding alone I’d easily rank the Attends Slip Classic around a 9 in this category (similar to the Attends Slip Regular Plus). The padding was highly resistant to clumping or tearing even after an extended period of wear. The only real indication of wear was a slight collapse of the padding between the legs where extra wide padding tends to collapse a bit. This has little-to-no impact on durability so I don’t weigh it heavily in scoring. Of minor note, the wetness indicator is a bit susceptible to moisture and may appear blue before the padding is actually wet or a change is needed. The primary issue with the Attends Slip Classic in terms of durability is the tape weakness. I found the tapes to have a strong tendency to slide or even lose adhesiveness after multiple-refastenings. This results in the diaper becoming looser with wear. It may also have been a bit due to stretching of the sides, but the side material isn’t particularly stretchy so I figured it was mostly on the tapes. You’ll also need to take some care when reapplying the tapes. For these reasons, it’s probably not a good choice for active wear since you don’t want the tapes to come undone while out and about but should be fine for lighter activities.


Durability Rating (wet): 6

I rank the Attends Slip Regular Plus slightly lower in terms of wet durability. The tape weakness continued to be a significant factor in durability, but I also found parts of the front padding were a bit more susceptible to tearing when wet. Even so, the padding generally held up well enough and it’s nowhere near the lowest performers in this regard (e.g. Attends Care Poly). The weight of a wet diaper will certainly factor into the tape performance. I’d have some concern about it coming loose if worn for active wear when wet, thus once again I’d suggest it for less active settings.

3.4 Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diaper Dry Test Deterioration


Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 5 cm (2"), 6 cm (2.4")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 6.5 cm (2.6"), 3 cm (1.2")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 4.5 cm (1.8"), 4 cm (1.6")

Profile Discretion Rating: 5

The Attends Slip Classic is far from the most discreet diaper on the market. I found it had a significant bulge at both the front and rear. The padding is quite wide and forms a spacious pouch, which makes it push outward on either side. The padding is also quite thick/dense and it has a modest rise above the waistline. Though, it does have enough give that you can reduce the profile a bit with meshpants or underwear. Nevertheless, while I wouldn’t say it’s the most obvious on the market, it will still be a tough one to hide.

4.1 Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diapers Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Attends Slip Classic 10 Adult Diapers Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 


Noise

Noise Rating: 8

The Attends Slip Classic has a wide area of padding with a plastic backsheet, which often would result in crinkling. However, the padding is quite dense and that helps buffer the noise while the plastic is relatively soft, similar to others like the Tena Slip Maxi or Attends Slip Regular Plus. Moreover, the cloth-like sides on this diaper are completely silent. With underwear or meshpants it would be easy to reduce it down to the point where you wouldn’t notice it at all. I can’t say I didn’t notice any noise during testing but I still rank it up near the top.

4.3 Attends Slip Classic 10 Noise Profile

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 9
I rank the Attends Slip Classic near the top when it comes to resistance to odors. Despite the relatively loose fit it seems like the padding and structure have a natural resistance to the formation of odors. I didn’t really notice any during testing. I do have some concerns that the loose fit could allow some odors to escape so I hesitate to rank it at the very top but I believe, like in other European Attends products, the padding itself goes some way to neutralizing odors. The plastic backsheet over key areas of padding and rear waistband also can be helpful in this regard.


Want to give the Attends Slip Classic 10 a try?

Help us continue to produce quality reviews by making a purchase through our Attends Slip Classic 10 affiliate link. With every purchase this blog will earn a small amount of commission at no extra cost to the purchaser.


Tuesday, 5 November 2024

Pull-Ups 5T-6T Protective Underwear Review

 *For more information on how I do reviews see Diaper Test Methodology


 

Summary

Over the past couple years as many review suggestions have come in for products beyond adult diapers we’ve expanded to cover disposable and reusable protective underwear as well incontinence pads. In this review, I’m excited to kick off the first of a sub-series of the largest youth diapers and would like to give special thanks for the donation of Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T to kick off this review series. In these reviews I’ll cover the largest available youth products and try to best determine whether any are of a size that will fit the underserved “middle” market of small adults/large youths. For those in that size range there are relatively limited products available and large youth products have the benefit of being considerably cheaper than adult products. As someone who is typically in the small/medium range for adult products I doubt that any of these products will fit properly, but I’ll do my best to assess at what level they’ll perform at when scaled down.

Arguably, Pull-Ups aren’t quite a diaper, but more of a hybrid protective underwear-diaper product, since they can be pulled on/off like regular underwear straight out of the package but have refastenable sides that can be attached/detached like a regular diaper. The fasteners on these are completely different from conventional diapers because the adhesive hook & loop tabs are on the front wing facing outward whereas diapers typically have such fasteners on the rear wings facing inwards. Otherwise, they very closely resemble the Goodnites line of products but are marketed toward toilet training rather than bedwetting. Moreover, the regular Pull-Ups covered in this review appear to be targeting daytime use because there’s a whole different product line for overnight wear. Like Goodnites, these are a gendered product with different areas of targeted absorbent padding for the boys vs girls product (this review will only be covering the boys version). I have to admit, I was highly skeptical I’d even be able to pull these around my waist but the waist size fit surprisingly well. It was the low rise that caused me the most trouble, which was just barely long enough to be functional. Absorbency was also slightly less than experienced in the Goodnites XL line of products, but not nearly as different as I would have expected for a product targeting half the weight range. Having tested and measured the Pull-Ups 5T-6T extensively, I’ve come to the conclusion that they will work best for someone up to 80% of my dimensions, so a weight of up to 110 lbs (50 kg) and a waist of 24~26” (61~66”). Certainly if you fit into such a range it could be a cost effective choice, assuming absorbency is sufficient.


Key Features:

  • Cloth-like backsheet
  • Dual waistbands
  • Colorful Disney character prints
  • Standing inner leak guards
  • Wetness indicator
  • Refastenable sides

Pros:

  • Comfortable and breathable
  • Easy to change
  • Highly flexible/durable

Cons:

  • Low absorbency
  • Thin mid/rear padding, susceptible to pressout leaks
  • Very small sizing (this product is designed for youths)

 

Product Details

For the purpose of this post I will be reviewing and referring to the large-sized 5T-6T sized Pull-Ups Boys Protective Underwear. However, other available sizes are listed below:


Packaging

Brand: Huggies Pull-Ups
Manufacturer: Kimberly-Clark Corp
Origin: USA
Units Per Bag: 14
Cost Per Unit: $
Dimensions (L x W x H): 17 cm (6.7") x 10 cm (3.9") x 23 cm (9.1")
Weight: 0.50 kg (1.1 lbs)
Available Sizes: 2T-3T,3T-4T,4T-5T,5T-6T
Advertised Absorbency: Day-Time

1.1 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear Packaging

Diaper

Backsheet: Cloth-like (non-woven)
Wetness Indicator: Yes (blue instrument outline at crotch, fades when wet)
Standing Inner Leak Guards: Yes
Leg Gathers: Yes
Product Style: Hybrid Protective Underwear
Refastenable Tabs: Yes
Number of Tapes: 1
Repositionable Tabs: Yes
Outer Color: Blue (Disney Mikey Mouse patterns)
Inner Color: White (blue sides)
Front Waistband: Yes
Rear Waistband: Yes
Folded Thickness: 1.2 cm (0.47")
Folded Length: 22 cm (8.7")
Dry Weight: 40 g (1.4 oz)
Fragrance: No
Diaper Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 53 cm (20.9") x 29 cm (11.4") x 17 cm (6.7") x 30 cm (11.8")
Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Padding Dimensions (L x fW x mW x bW): 43 cm (16.9") x 10 cm (3.9") x 8 cm (3.2") x 10 cm (3.9")
Padding Wing Dimensions (fPW x fPH x bPW x bPH): 1 cm (0.4") x 9 cm (3.5") x 1 cm (0.4") x 8 cm (3.2")
Padding Wing Shape (Front, Rear): Rectangular, Rectangular
Total Padding Area: 378 cm2 (59 in2)
Tape Spacing (t1): 1 cm (0.4")
Tape (W x L): 11.5 cm (4.5") x 1.5 cm (0.6")


1.2 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear


Laboratory Absorbency Tests

Total Absorption Volume (after press out): 470 ml (16.6 oz)
Total Absorption Volume (before press out): 472 ml (16.7 oz)
Time to Absorb Wettings (first to last): (39 s, 38 s)
Wet Folded Thickness: 4 cm (1.6")
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 100%
Total Padding to Absorbency Ratio: 1.42 ml / cm2 (0.32 oz / in2)
Press Out Volume: 2 ml (0.07 oz)

Surface Dampness Rating: 6

Considering it has such a low overall absorbency, the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T performed surprisingly well with regards to surface dampness. During the lab test there was no perceivable moisture after the first wetting. It was more noticeable on the second wetting, but not completely saturated like I’ve seen in some tests. This aligns it with what was seen in the Goodnites XL. I can also say, I noticed a similar thing during real world testing, but what I found was the front padding was considerably more resistant to surface dampness than the rear padding.


2.1 Wet vs Dry Diaper After Capacity Test


2.2 Used vs Unused Padding After Capacity Test


"Real World" Absorbency Tests

Posture Tests


Standing-Sitting

Total Absorbed Volume: 360 ml (12.7 oz)
Total Wettings: (1 standing)
Leaked After Sitting: Yes
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 96%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 0.95 ml / cm2 (0.22 oz / in2)

Standing-Sitting Rating: 2
The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T surprised me when tested while standing. I was very much expecting a rapid leak given my being well above the intended sizing. Instead, the first wetting while standing was fully absorbed without leaks. Though not to say it didn’t feel a bit precarious at first, as there was initially considerable pooling in the mid padding that lasted a minute or so before being fully absorbed and surely could have leaked if shifted too much one way or another, but wasn’t affected by regular walking. Once fully absorbed the underwear swelled a bit, but otherwise felt comfortable and the surface dampness wasn’t too noticeable. Its breathable design certainly helped in that regard. The performance up to this point was similar to what I experienced when testing the Goodnites so I was very much expecting a leak upon sitting and the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T did indeed moderately leak through the rear leg gathers very soon after sitting. The overall absorbency was only a little short of what was found when testing the Goodnites, but none of these have enough absorbency to protect against pressout moisture upon sitting without the use of a booster pad. To keep with a consistent scale, I’m rating the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T according to the same standard as other products in this blog, but clearly they could score better if adjusted for youth needs.


Lying Down

Total Absorbed Volume: 435 ml (15.3 oz)
Total Wettings: 1
Used to Total Padding Ratio: 100%
Padding to Absorbency Score: 1.15 ml / cm2 (0.26 oz / in2)

Lying Down Rating: 1

The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T isn’t designed for bedwetting. Instead, there seems to be a night version of Pull-Ups or Goodnites product line that fill the overnight role. In any case, this product won’t absorb a full wetting when lying down and, assuming you’re able to fit it, it would be best used only if you have small to moderate leakage overnight. During testing it was comparable to a less absorbent version of Goodnites. The first wetting quickly resulted in pooling, which pushed back up the front and leaked out through the wings. By the end of the wetting, the underwear was completely saturated. Interestingly, the absorbency wasn’t that different from the Goodnites L/XL Boys or Goodnites L/XL Girls, though neither of those hit the same level of padding saturation when lying down. Once again, I’m rating the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T according to the general standard in this blog and they will perform a bit better when adjusted for youth needs.


2.3 Pattern of Used vs Unused Padding Test Stand/Sit (right) Lying Down (left)


Daily Wear and Bedwetting

The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T was a challenging product to review given my being well over the intended weight range. This line of protective underwear is clearly marketing for toilet training, though arguably the 5T-6T range will be quite sufficient for older youths with special needs above the 60 lbs (27 kg) given its sizing and performance are not considerably lower than that of the Goodnites line, which tops out at 140 lbs (64 kg). For reference, my weight of ~140 lbs (64 kg) / waist 30~32” (76~81 cm) has me at the top of the Goodnites XL suggested range. That underwear fits well for me, even if the waist rise is a little lower than I might otherwise prefer. It also consistently absorbs at least a single wetting without leaks when combined with a small diaper booster (without the booster it’s hit-or-miss and quite susceptible to pressout moisture upon sitting after a wetting). In testing, I found the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T fit surprisingly well around my waist, as the sides had no trouble stretching and sitting where they were without feeling tight. I’d initially expected the refastenable sides to tear open, but it never happened once, they were solid. The primary source of discomfort was the low rise, with the protective underwear just barely giving me enough rise to be functional. Looking at the measurements, I found the dimensions of the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T were about 80% of the Goodnites XL, so perhaps a more accurate maximum to the range would be a weight of 110 lbs (50 kg) and a waist of 24~26” (61~66”) and even at that range it would be best used with a diaper booster. With that in mind, I did my best to give these a thorough review. In my testing, they clearly weren’t suited for bedwetting and leaked quickly in that scenario. The big problem with these is that the most absorbent padding is up at the front and the rear padding has very little absorbency. But with me being oversized for these, it also was prone to damming in the mid-section due to the snug fit, resulting in quick leaks through the sides. When tested for daily wear, this protective underwear consistently absorbed a full wetting while standing. In that case, the tightness of the Pull-Ups might have actually been a benefit as I found there was significant pooling but nothing made it through the edges. Either way, even if it absorbs a full wetting while standing it will leak very soon after sitting, though I can imagine smaller wettings that stay contained in the front padding won’t make it to the thinner mid-rear padding. So with all that in mind, while this protective underwear is targeted at youths it might actually work for some small adults or teens with dimensions at 80% or less of my own. Personally, it was good to know they could even be feasible for someone my size and I’d certainly consider them if I was in a pinch and couldn’t find a larger product. Absorbency is somewhat limited and I would only trust it to not leak if your wettings are typically 250 ml (8.5 oz) or less. But if that works for your needs then these consistently come in at a cheaper price than Goodnites or other adult diapers and could be a budget-friendly alternative.


Suitability for Bowel Incontinence: 6

When appropriately sized, the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T are likely a little better suited to managing bowel leakage than the Goodnites if only due to the easy-change sides. Otherwise, the two products are nearly identical in this regard. Pull-Ups have key features you’d want for bowel management like standing inner leak guards and dual waistbands. Though the breathable design will make them more susceptible to odors and the thin/limited rear padding will limit its utility. Still I wouldn’t say these are as well suited as diapers to the matter.


Wear & Tear Tests


Fitting

The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T is designed for a weight range of 46-60 lbs (21-27 kg) and sits as the largest product of the Pull-Ups lineup. The target range is clearly youths. So, as one might expect, this protective underwear will only properly fit very small adults or teens, though based on my experience there’s a very generous amount of give above the 60 lbs (27 kg) limit (for reference, I’m a little over the double that and was able to find a functional fit). Looking at the dimension measurements, this makes sense as the measurements are generally within 80% of the similarly built Goodnites XL, which has a target range up to 140 lbs (64 kg) and fits me comfortably. The Pull-Ups protective underwear is similar to Goodnites, but has what I call a hybrid diaper-protective underwear design. You can pull it up/down like regular underwear, but it also has hook & loop fasteners on the front wings that connect to the rear wings. So it can also be attached and detached like a regular diaper, by fastening the wings together. This would make it a convenient product for changes on the go where removing pants for a change isn’t practical. Also, like Goodnites, this protective underwear features a cloth-like backsheet and highly elastic, breathable design. The underwear’s rise is also several centimeters short of the already low rise on the Goodnites.

3.1 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Fastener


Ease-of-Use Rating: 9

If you or the one you care for is actually able to fit the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T protective underwear then it’s about as easy to use a product as you can find. It has the great features of a diaper, like the ability to make adjustments after applying it and a wetness indicator to let you know when it’s time for change. Alternatively, you can just pull it up and down like regular underwear and the super elastic design means minimal adjustments are likely needed anyway. However, there are a few issues to watch for. Like the pre-Quicksorb versions Goodnites, the sides on this underwear can become a little loose with extended wear, which puts it at risk of sagging. Also, I found the hook & loop fastener design could be a bit tricky to fasten because it goes against the normal diaper convention. The fastener material is on the front wings/faces outward and you need to stretch to rear wings over it for fitting, but there is a limit to how much you’d actually want to stretch it because pulling it too far forward will cause the wing to overhang so the fastening must be nearly perfectly aligned between the edge of the rear wing and the front wing. Without that perfect alignment you will end up with an overhang of the rear wing, which risks getting caught on clothing and coming undone. In a typical diaper the fastener would be on the rear wings and facing inward, which is ideal for changes. For this reason, it will be much easier to remove using the side tabs than to put on a new one via this method. This product is definitely designed primarily for use as protective underwear. Still, I don’t count that too much against Pull-Ups as it’s not a core use-case and the hybrid design is still a major differentiator compared with nearly every other product on the market.

3.2 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear Fit

Comfort


Comfort Rating (dry): 9

I rate the dry comfort of the Pull-Ups protective underwear at about the same level as that of Goodnites. These were obviously a little too small for me, but I didn’t detract from comfort rating on that account as they’re designed for youth wear. This underwear is highly comfortable with a highly breathable design and I never felt like I was overheating during wear. They are somewhat susceptible to overstretching and very slight sagging after extended wear, but the sides are rock solid and I never notice any sign of tearing or deterioration. The padding itself is also robust, just like the Goodnites, and doesn’t easily clump or tear. Even being oversized for these, I found the fit to be snug and surprisingly comfortable so I’m quite confident those with a proper fit will have no issues with dry comfort.


Comfort Rating (wet): 6

The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T ranks similar to the Goodnites XL for wet comfort. The absorbency is lower, but for its targeted weight range that’s less an issue. Both are made of the same sort of material, with a padding that’s relatively good at resisting surface dampness in its core “targeted” areas. Yet in the thinner padding toward the mid-section and rear it’s far more susceptible to pressout moisture and will feel notably damper than the front padding. Also, the padding in this protective underwear will remain relatively intact without obvious additional tearing or clumping when wet. However, one thing that may detract from wet comfort is the slight tendency to sag as the sides stretch and can give the feeling of it coming loose.

3.3 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear Topsheet and Backsheet

Durability

Dry Padding Deterioration Proportion: 17.2% (topsheet), 15.5% (backsheet)
Shake Deterioration Test: 3 shakes to deterioration


Durability Rating (dry): 9
I rate the Pull-Up Boys 5T-6T at about the same level as the Goodnites XL when it comes to dry durability. During the dry durability test the performance was remarkably similar with no deterioration in the core padding. There was no noticeable clumping or tearing of the padding, just some peripheral damage. I believe the sizing contributed to it appearing larger than it actually was, and I feel in this case the percent of deterioration can be overlooked when much of it was non-impactful. Additionally, I found I was able to wear the Pull-Ups protective underwear for many hours without any sign of the sides coming loose or overstretching. It maintained a comfortable fit the whole time, with only a slight loosening after many hours of wear. I also tried reattaching the tabs on the side, and while they can be difficult to position, they can easily be reattached multiple times without deteriorating or significantly losing adhesiveness. I have no doubt this protective underwear can be worn for very active wear without worry about deterioration. Though one thing I will note is that it’s similar to the previous generation of the Goodnites XL with an issue where the outer cloth material can separate from the plastic backsheet after a while. It doesn’t impact performance, just makes it look a bit more deteriorated than it otherwise might.


Durability Rating (wet): 8

The wet state of the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T is little changed from its dry state. In both cases the only obvious deterioration happened near the periphery of the padding with core padding remaining intact. However, like the Goodnites XL, the Pull-Ups sides can lose some of their flexibility over time. I wouldn’t say it’s a huge issue, just something to be aware of. I don’t feel the condition of the padding will be significantly impacted by activity when wet, perhaps being only slightly more susceptible to clumping. Regardless, I again rank the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T the same as the Goodnites XL in this regard, given the obvious similarities.

3.4 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear Dry Test Deterioration


Discretion Tests


Profile

Front Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 0 cm (0"), 0 cm (0")
Back Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 0 cm (0"), 0 cm (0")
Side Rise Above Waistline (Jeans, Sweatpants): 0 cm (0"), 0 cm (0")

Profile Discretion Rating: 10

The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T  have the same profile, scaled down, as the Goodnites XL. If you’re able to properly fit this protective underwear and are at an age where you’d actually care about discretion, then it’s highly unlikely to be noticed as it fits with a low profile and the padding is quite thin. It should be super easy to conceal this under clothing. However, this comes with a big caveat. The outer print of this underwear is a mix of colorful Disney Characters that would be quite obvious if the backsheet were exposed through thin outerwear or above the waistline.

4.1 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear Jeans Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right)

4.2 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear Sweats Profile (left) vs Normal Underwear (right) 


Noise

Noise Rating: 10

The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T are nearly identical to the Goodnites when it comes to noise discretion. They have a very flexible design and cloth-like backsheet that isn’t susceptible to noise. Though, for whatever reason, did notice a crinkling noise a bit more from these when compared with the Goodnites. I suspect this is because the rather tight fit pulled the cloth-like backsheet looser from the underlying plastic layer, so this won’t be as much of an issue for those with a better fit. The hook & loop bits on the side might also cause some noise if they become dislodged, but I didn’t notice any noise from those. In any case, it would be quite easy to conceal this sound under clothing.

4.3 Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T Protective Underwear Noise Profile
 

Odor Reduction

Odor Reduction Rating: 8
The Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T once again matches the Goodnites when it comes to odor discretion. It has no added fragrance and a very breathable design. The area of padding coverage is also relatively limited. Moreover, I’d say the front padding, which is more absorbent and resistant to surface dampness will outperform the rear padding when it comes to odor reduction. Yet, for a product like Pull-Ups, perhaps odor discretion is less important anyway as its primary purpose is toilet training so ideally it’d never get to that point.


Want to give the Pull-Ups Boys 5T-6T a try?

Help us continue to produce quality reviews by making a purchase through our Goodnites Girls Bedwetting Nightime Underwear affiliate link. With every purchase this blog will earn a small amount of commission at no extra cost to the purchaser.